I woke Saturday to Tara the Antisocial Social Worker's rant of the fantastically righteous variety. I love this stuff. Giving context to the claims of the Republicans and conservatives is vitally important. As is pointing out the dishonesty in the way this talking point is framed.
At the very moment I found Tara's diary, the Front Page had Laura's piece about the Heritage Foundation misusing statistics in their claim about how great life is when you live in poverty.
And it occurred to me...this '50 percent' thing has never passed my smell test. Could conservatives and Republicans be repeating a false reading of a statistic and the zombie media uncritically repeating the falsehood? Do baby's make poopy diapers? Yes, of course the claim is factually deficient at best and more likely a deliberate misrepresentation, and of course the zombie media is not taking a critical look.
The problem with both lines of defense that we tend to make in this argument is they both accept what Republicans and conservatives say as having a modicum of truth. What's good about both is they try to lend some context, but they don't give the complete context or put numbers to that context.
Please follow along as I blow up that '50 percent' myth, smack down the media while doing their jobs for them, and put some numbers to the points Tara was making.
Update: Thanks for the rec list folks. If you dig this diary, please do what I implored in my immediate previous diary and pay Robert Greenwald some attention.
Read More