Skip to main content

View Diary: Apple and Unbridled Capitalism (248 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  no reason not to! (39+ / 0-)

    Daily Kos: Apple and Unbridled Capitalism

    I'm not really trying to pressure Apple

    corporations functioning in a democracy should be open to criticism.

    it disgusts me when economists gloat about china's 'growth' when this is the human price for it.

    i heard the mike daisey's 'short-form' version of his stage show on 'this american life' podcast, and it was spellbinding. he really cuts to the bone with his tone and pacing, preceding his expose with a confession of being the ultimate apple fanboy, pulling his macbook pro into 45 pieces every night 'to relax', compressed-air cleaning the bits (!), then putting it back all together again.

    softened by his merry admissions, prepare to be flattened by his remorseless disclosures about the obscene working conditions these poor people have to work in.

    steve jobs was a genius for sure, but his refusal to open his factories in his own country, just so iphones can be cheaper, is shitty karma.

    his surname 'jobs' should make us think a bit...

    check out mike, he speaks terrible truth with a twist of wit.

    thanks for this diary, this is so important... i love mac stuff too, but this is very troubling, and we need to make this known far and wide.

    why? just kos..... *just cause*

    by melo on Sat Jan 21, 2012 at 11:47:20 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  His point is that the author picked a specific (12+ / 0-)

      one to use in his title, which thoroughly distorts the breadth of the point he's trying to make. ALL of these companies need to be pressured to force Foxconn and any other 'assembly' contractor they use to take the steps necessary to insure that the workplace their product is made in is as safe and humanitarianly run as we would expect our own workplace in that company's US or Japanese or ?wherever? facility to be.


      Conservatism is a function of age - Rousseau
      I've been 19 longer'n you've been alive - me

      by watercarrier4diogenes on Sat Jan 21, 2012 at 12:01:29 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  China also has a problem (16+ / 0-)

      Consider that Shenzen was nothing more than a fishing village 10 years ago and now has a population of a million.

      Yes the wages and conditions are horrible. I think the condition solution is obvious but what about the wages? Should they be doubled? What would that instantly do to the local economy.

      Should they machine up?

      China has 1.4Billion people and the largest concern with the government is civil unrest. By doing manual assembly versus machine they can put more people to work.

      I dont believe there is an easy solution to a real problem for China. As American consumers we can make a difference and I love Mac products, but this concerns me.

      •  This article is in the NY Times..... (28+ / 0-)

        on roughly the same question.  If you can't be essentially a wage slave living in a dorm, ready to be marched out to overtime so Apple can make a deadline, you are not a competitive worker.

        Frankly the article made me sick to my stomach and made me regret every Apple product I have bought recently.  I have been trying to avoid buying Chinese stuff for some time, but unless as consumers we are willing to only buy products made with less oppresive working conditions, we won't affect this.  

        You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you mad. Aldous Huxley

        by murrayewv on Sat Jan 21, 2012 at 02:09:04 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Good article (12+ / 0-)

          Americans cannot, nor should they try, to compete with Chinese or Indian labor.
          We do not have the labor resources that these entire countries can throw at a job. And American consumers are too apathetic to even care.

          Free trade, a mantra of corporate America, is killing our economy, exploiting foreign labor and creating profits for a select few that are simply disgusting for any moral human being.

          Those jobs wont come back unless laws change that tells company bottom lines that if you want to do business here it will be in your best interest to create jobs here. China puts something like a 40% tariff on foreign imports .. obviously the US market would not stand for that and thus change the way they do business.

          At minimum US corps should demand working conditions be humane and provide the same worker safety as US based corps.

          •  Bull. We are the most productive workforce on (17+ / 0-)

            the planet.  We automate.  We figure out much better, faster, safer ways to manufacture and assemble.

            Apple and the others took the easy way out.. no investment in automation or robotics necessary.. throw cheap people at the problem.  It's disgusting.

            We could likely do those jobs with a comparatively much smaller percentage of workers.  But, yes.. it would cost more. And that is all Apple and HP and the rest of them care about.

            •  Part of the blame should go to Wall Street... (11+ / 0-)


              Because Wall Street tends to favor stocks in companies that don't load themselves down with too many expensive capital assets like factories and automation equipment.

              Wall Street's ideal is pretty well exemplified by companies like Apple and Nike -- essentially, design and marketing houses that outsource all the actual manufacturing work.

              Political Compass: -6.75, -3.08

              by TexasTom on Sat Jan 21, 2012 at 05:37:09 PM PST

              [ Parent ]

            •  I think you misunderstood (2+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:
              Food Gas Lodging, victoria2dc

              my statement.

              We cannot compete with the massive amount of physical labor resources that these countries can throw at manufacturing.

              They can automate also, machine up, use robotics all that technology already exists. But they dont utilize it, why? Because they are busy trying to put people to work.

              Just like the US there is more DEMAND for jobs than actual jobs.

              Now isnt that interesting?

            •  Read the article (17+ / 0-)

              Read the article, it's quite interesting. The reason that Apple moved manufacturing from the US to China wasn't wages; wages are a small percentage of the cost. The real reasons are:

              1) The US has destroyed its ability to manufacture, so Apple couldn't staff in the US. Apple estimated that it could take them 9 months to hire enough industrial engineers to run their manufacturing in the US, and in China they hired the same number in 15 days.

              2) The world's manufacturing has moved to the Pacific Rim, so it's more efficient to manufacture there because the suppliers are all there. "Need 1m screws? The factory is two blocks over. Need the screw modified? You'll have it in three hours." So even US manufacturers (e.g. Corning, who makes the glass in the iPhone) set up manufacturing in the Pacific Rim, to be where their customers are.

              Of course, if the US hadn't adopted "free trade" in the 70's, and destroyed its ability to manufacture goods, things might be different. But mass market manufacturing in the US is dead.

              Note that Germany, and Japan, countries that have higher wages and more regulation than the US, are able to compete quite effectively. But then, they have an industrial policy that encourages manufacturing, and training engineers, etc., to be world class. We don't.

              •  Need workers.... (1+ / 0-)
                Recommended by:

                wake them up and march them from the dorm for overtime.  Need a building....the government will build it for you.  Need engineers?  Government will train them for you.

                Our government doesn't do this entirely for our manufacturers, but they do build industrial parks and have worker training.  We are a less compliant culture.  And the guy wi the training couldn't keep his job while everything was being shipped to China.  It is complicated, but one thing is for sure, we aren't competing on a level playing field.

                You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you mad. Aldous Huxley

                by murrayewv on Sun Jan 22, 2012 at 05:46:22 AM PST

                [ Parent ]

            •  This was true 50 years ago: (1+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:
              We are the most productive workforce on the planet.

              You should take a look on more recent developments and ask yourself: In which sectors can the American industry really compete?

              You'll be shocked.

              There's a reason why America's main exports are movies, software, franchising, and weapons...and the valuable services of the financial industry, of course.

              Productive, my ass.

              "Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect." Mark Twain

              by aufklaerer on Sun Jan 22, 2012 at 04:55:38 AM PST

              [ Parent ]

            •  Issue for Apple is not wages or productivity (1+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:

              It is supply chain.

              Same applies in many industries.

              For example, I've worked with garment companies in China.  Even if the wanted to move work to the US at US prices it would be difficult or impossible.

              If you want to make bras in the US where will you find a lamination company that can laminate lace onto fabric and increase production at short capacity?  Where can you find mechanics who know how to fix sock knitting machines?  Where can you find designers who know how to program a sock machine to make a sock with a particular pattern and shape?  Where can you find companies that can provide an order of custom buttons and trims with a 3 day turn around?  

              It goes on and on and on.  It takes decades to build up the industrial ecosystem that makers of complex products rely on.

              I'm working now with some people looking at helping move low end Chinese garment companies to cheaper countries.  It's brutal - you can't bring just one company over.  You need to strike deals with suppliers and suppliers' suppliers to set up co-located operations.

              The US has lost this and getting it back will be difficult or impossible.

        •  I had a different response to the same article. (18+ / 0-)

          It's rather lengthy, but a good read for anyone interested in the subject...
          NY Times: How U.S. Lost Out on iPhone Work

          It wasn't about Apple's "unbridled" capitalism. What I gat was how America has failed at producing a workforce which is competitive in the world electronics manufacturing market.

          Apple tried to keep their manufacturing in the US, but the, at the time, struggling company had to move their manufacturing  in order to stay competitive.

          In its early days, Apple usually didn’t look beyond its own backyard for manufacturing solutions. A few years after Apple began building the Macintosh in 1983, for instance, Mr. Jobs bragged that it was “a machine that is made in America.” In 1990, while Mr. Jobs was running NeXT, which was eventually bought by Apple, the executive told a reporter that “I’m as proud of the factory as I am of the computer.” As late as 2002, top Apple executives occasionally drove two hours northeast of their headquarters to visit the company’s iMac plant in Elk Grove, Calif.

          But by 2004, Apple had largely turned to foreign manufacturing. Guiding that decision was Apple’s operations expert, Timothy D. Cook, who replaced Mr. Jobs as chief executive last August, six weeks before Mr. Jobs’s death. Most other American electronics companies had already gone abroad, and Apple, which at the time was struggling, felt it had to grasp every advantage.

          The Chinese are serious competitors. For the glass on the new iPhones Jobs had it produced in the US by Corning. But to cut and grind the glass for the phones was a huge task. What did China do to get the bid? Lots...

          When an Apple team visited, the Chinese plant’s owners were already constructing a new wing. “This is in case you give us the contract,” the manager said, according to a former Apple executive. The Chinese government had agreed to underwrite costs for numerous industries, and those subsidies had trickled down to the glass-cutting factory. It had a warehouse filled with glass samples available to Apple, free of charge. The owners made engineers available at almost no cost. They had built on-site dormitories so employees would be available 24 hours a day.

          The Chinese plant got the job.

          How do we compete with this?...

          “The entire supply chain is in China now,” said another former high-ranking Apple executive. “You need a thousand rubber gaskets? That’s the factory next door. You need a million screws? That factory is a block away. You need that screw made a little bit different? It will take three hours.”
          Another critical advantage for Apple was that China provided engineers at a scale the United States could not match. Apple’s executives had estimated that about 8,700 industrial engineers were needed to oversee and guide the 200,000 assembly-line workers eventually involved in manufacturing iPhones. The company’s analysts had forecast it would take as long as nine months to find that many qualified engineers in the United States.

          In China, it took 15 days.

          I'd say the problems run much deeper than Apple out to make a buck.

          "Cannibals prefer those who have no spines." ~ Stanislaw Lem

          by BlogDog on Sat Jan 21, 2012 at 03:34:26 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  Ah, but that takes the romance out... (3+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            Food Gas Lodging, auapplemac, BlogDog

            Because Apple is seen as "trendy," it automatically becomes prime target, even if it's one of a hundred in the same situation and kept its manufacturing in the US longer than most.

            Multiple-platform for twenty or so years now, I've always observed with great amusement the envy and rage the mere existence of Apple generates in what is fortunately a fairly small minority of tech geeks. Human rights is merely one more excuse, now that "PCs have far more programs" has pretty well reached the end of its shelf life.

            When we are no longer children, we are already dead. (Constantin Brancusi) And whoever gave it, thanks for the gift!

            by sagesource on Sat Jan 21, 2012 at 06:08:47 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

          •  Making a buck is a huge factor (3+ / 0-)

            It makes people uncomfortable to learn that the machines they use are build by companies that exploit workers.

            You imply that Jobs had no choice. He did have choices as do the present directors of Apple.

            The best excuse that they could come up with is that it would take nine months to come up with 8,700 industrial engineers. The article didn't state that Apple couldn't find the engineers, only that it would take nine months. Nine months? That's a poor excuse. In fact it's a decision that was looking for an manufactured excuse.

            But for the sake of argument let's ignore the outsourcing of jobs (which I might add was absolutely terrible when Bain did it). From the article you cite it appears that the Chinese were falling over themselves to accommodate the needs of Mr. Jobs. Gaskets next door. Screws a block away. A brand new wing built "in case" they received the new contract.

            The Apple company and Mr. Jobs had some influence. Perhaps they could have made receiving that new contract contingent on Foxcom paying their workers better, reducing their hours and improving he working conditions. Apple chose not to do so. Why? Perhaps they were unaware of the situation, but I rather doubt it. They definitely know about it now. I think a more reasonable answer is the bottom line.

            A proud member of the Professional Left since 1967.

            by slatsg on Sun Jan 22, 2012 at 08:16:26 AM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  Heh. You know what happens if you do that, right? (0+ / 0-)

              Then the Foxconn recruiters start selling the jobs - you can't get the job unless you pay the recruiter RMB 10,000 or if you're his type maybe he lets you have the job for a blow job.

              This happens at a lot of factories that increase salaries over the local wage rate for social compliance reasons.  The workers end up no better off but the factory becomes a stew of corruption - the workers pay the recruiters for their jobs, the recruiters pay the HR managers for their jobs, the HR managers pay the head of HR for their jobs, and the head of HR pays the factory manager for his job.

              The factory owners hate this - it's even worse than having to raise wages because once you get this culture it spreads into procurement, admin, etc. and suddenly everyone is stealing from you, including the people who are supposed to be stopping workers from stealing from you.  I worked with one factory in Pakistan where workers were stealing equipment components, throwing them out the window to confederates who would come to the factory door the next morning trying to sell them back at a lower price than buying replacement equipment.

              The only people who lose out in an arrangement like that are the people at the bottom - the workers - since they can't extract rents from anyone below them.

        •  Avoiding Chinese products... (5+ / 0-)

 virtually impossible.  

          Are there any MP3 players built outside of China?  Laptops?  Computer speakers?  In too many instances the choice is buying Chinese-built or not buying at all.  (And, yeah, I know that good arguments can be made for the latter choice...but that's a somewaht separate discussion.)

          Political Compass: -6.75, -3.08

          by TexasTom on Sat Jan 21, 2012 at 05:35:06 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  My Mp3 player is from Iceland. No shit. (2+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            TexasTom, Odysseus

            The company is called 'United' and it says 'Made in Iceland'. It was a gift, so can't take credit for not buying Chinese.

            Pressuring the transnational corporations seems to be the most effective way to bring about change in the working and living conditions of Chinese workers. Apple is fair game, as are all the other manufacturers.

            "Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect." Mark Twain

            by aufklaerer on Sun Jan 22, 2012 at 05:02:57 AM PST

            [ Parent ]

        •  I also read the NY Times article, (0+ / 0-)

          with consternation. I don't buy Apple products because I don't like their arrogance. The MP3 is not made by Apple alone. As an example of vulture capitalism, Apple has to be singled out and shamed. Steve Jobs had the gall to tell the White House that those jobs are not coming back to America. He had such a sweet deal with Foxxcom he was proud of it, ignoring the human cost and the cost to the Country that enabled his wealth. The article pointed out the expediancy in scaling operations and the speed of production. At what human cost I ask? As if the planet would be in peril if an i phone with a better screen were delayed by a month! Shame on Apple and the pox on your houses.

      •  The Answer is More Jobs for More Workers (6+ / 0-)

        Yes, using people instead of machines makes sense in some places.  But that doesn't mean people must be treated like machines.

        Instead of squeezing inhuman labor and hours from your employees, you increase your labor costs by employing MORE workers.

        More money into the local economy and workers' lives are improved.

        Of course, that cuts into corporate profits and/or increases product costs.  Few companies do that willingly, without pressure from governments, customers, organized labor and related counter-forces.

        Yet, that must be a goat - unless we all want to live in a right-wing or libertarian dystopia. Occupy!

        Surprise, we live in a Left-Of-Center Nation! Act accordingly.

        by VA Gal on Sat Jan 21, 2012 at 03:17:31 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

      •  Doesn't matter what brand you buy (5+ / 0-)

        consumer electronics are all made this way.  It's why we have a disposable gadget culture.  Without slave labor, there wouldn't be disposable gadgets.

        By disposable, I mean you plan on replacing gadgets/computers within 2-5 years when they become obsolete.

        "When I was an alien, cultures weren't opinions" ~ Kurt Cobain, Territorial Pissings

        by Subterranean on Sat Jan 21, 2012 at 03:35:22 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  They would not become obsolete (6+ / 0-)

          Because we would NOT be willing to replace them so quickly, if they cost us more.  Frankly, it's the culture of Cheap that creates the culture of Throwaway.  You don't throw away things that cost you a bundle.  You conserve, repair, and re-use.  It's the ability to produce and dump on the market for less than the costs of repairing an existing product, that enables our profoundly wasteful eagerness to constantly have the Newest, the Biggest, and the "Best" (most recently advertised bells & whistles), to the point where a sufficiently critical mass of consumers upgrades equipment leaving those who WANT to conserve, being FORCED to upgrade due to compatibility issues.

          A nasssty little item called a "tariff" could fix this issue overnight, if it didn't violate the religious tenets of Modern Capitalism.  Old-fashioned Capitalism had no such compunctions, with Tariff structures underpinning the original development of pretty much all industrial powerhouses.

        •  That's just not true. Paying 3-5% per unit (4+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          Kurt Sperry, Ivan, Naniboujou, BradyB

          more so that the producers of this technojunk could make a living wage wouldn't somehow price it all out of reach.

          Fear is your only God.

          by JesseCW on Sat Jan 21, 2012 at 06:46:54 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

        •  It's Jobs' great gift to us. Way cool! (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:

          Just another pirate, imo.  What exactly did he (himself) invent?

      •  Social unrest is desired. (3+ / 0-)

        Does anybody still remember that China is a communist country? Aren't we suppose to fight communism? China revolution to democracy is desired. That is the real solution. Working conditions are horrible in China because they are dictatorship country, period. Change it to democracy and horrible working conditions will eventually disappear.

    •  Jobs couldn't have opened factories (3+ / 0-)

      in the US even if he wanted to. We haven't been training manufacturing engineers for decades at the level required. Of course, we could always steal them from Europe and Asia.

      •  We haven't been training manufacturing engineers.. (10+ / 0-)

        ...because the jobs don't exist for them once they graduate.

        If Jobs and his counterparts were willing to open factories in the US, I think we'd see people lining up to enroll in the appropriate programs to get those degrees.

        Political Compass: -6.75, -3.08

        by TexasTom on Sat Jan 21, 2012 at 05:42:32 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  I'm one of the Engineers America could have had (3+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          Odysseus, The Wizard, mustang dvs

          I put in a few months at one of America's best engineering schools, at the beginning of the Clinton Presidency.  Speaking of that time period, to the best of my knowledge, what you're saying is true.  I was hearing tremendous negativity about the job market, in general.  Specific to what I wanted to do, at orientation one of the school officials got up and said "Many of you guys are thinking about going into Aerospace.  Don't go into Aerospace, you will not get a job."  When I'm on my deathbed, I know I'm going to look back and say that was a key turning point in my life.

          To the best of my knowledge, the private sector is truly not making the investment in American workers it needs to.  There were only 300 students in the freshmen class at the very elite private school I went to.  On day one, every one of those students should have had a big corporation begging to sponsor them.  Are engineers not more important than ball players?  But the private sector is all about maximizing wealth transfer to the .1% .  Not only do they fail to invest in the next generation of Americans, they'll bring in H1B labor breakers to drive down the wages of the Americans who do manage to get an education.  They bring down wages to the point where you might as well stay in the hood and sell drugs, or get your education as a plumber.    

          All that aside, I can say I was guaranteed a job as an engineer by the public sector, with the caveat that it be as an officer in the Army, and that my degree be Mechanical Engineering.  

          I can say, to an extent, America was willing to invest in me as an Engineer.  But - the scholarship I had still left my family trying to cover far more expense than they could.  Some people have told me I should have gotten a job to pay for tuition - well, this was a very expensive place to go to, and I was trying to hang with the top students in the world.  While physically exhausted by Ranger PT.  Maybe you've heard the saying, "cheap, good, fast - pick any two."  The sentiment applies- you can try to do it all but while reaching for more of one thing you'll lose a bit of another.  I made my best go at being a soldier and a Mechanical Engineer (although I didn't want to be either).  I won my Ranger Beret, and, despite being so drained from Ranger training that I was falling asleep in classes, I kept up a passing grade.  I wasn't the top student, but I was beating students who didn't get up early for PT.  And they were very smart guys, some of the smartest in the world!  

          The country, either public or private, needed to pick up the finances.  Somehow the decision was made that this wasn't worthwhile.  

          Now America asks, where are our Engineers?  I wonder . . .

          The R does not stand for Republican.

          by Jack the R on Sun Jan 22, 2012 at 12:02:51 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

    •  Cheaper iphones, maybe. Bigger profits for sure. (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      melo, hooper

      If cheaper products were the big concern they would be cheaper and profits lower.

      republicans have a point about job creation. If we ended regulations about how people here are paid or treated and if they could trash environment freely we'd have more jobs here

      Was so sad when I first learned about this and when Jobs died I was sorry that this issue came to mind right away. It comes whenever I think or Apple or Jobs
      They are not the only ones doing it, all the sadder. They are the ones we think of as cool. This isn't cool.

    •  You have no idea what true poverty is (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Claudius Bombarnac, Odysseus
      it disgusts me when economists gloat about china's 'growth' when this is the human price for it.

      This is not a price.  It is a huge benefit.

      Migrant workers literally fight each other to get through the mobs applying for jobs at companies like Foxconn.  They do that because it is one hell of a lot better than the alternatives.

      I speak Chinese and I've trekked up in the mountains in Western China where people don't have those opportunities.

      There are villages where no one washes for the whole winter because no one has hot water and it is too cold.  Building a communal village bath house with hot water is a major social advance in places like that.  I've seen 10 year old kids who have dropped out of school to work on the family vegetable plot or to gather Chinese medicine herbs in the local forests.

      Having a family member with a factory job and the "4 Golds"  (China's equivalent of SS, Medicare, etc.)  is a major advance for these people.  It can literally mean that children in the extended family make it through the winter.

      These jobs are not pretty, but they are a heck of a lot better than the alternative.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site