Skip to main content

View Diary: Dear Mr. Matthews: (264 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  here you go... (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    gramofsam1, Amber6541, collardgreens

    Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

    "But once John Boehner is sworn in as Speaker, then he’s going to have responsibilities to govern. You can’t just stand on the sidelines and be a bomb thrower." - President Obama, 12-07-2010

    by justmy2 on Fri Feb 10, 2012 at 06:03:55 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  Thanks! I think it's so important (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Amber6541, I love OCD

      that we base our arguments on facts.  If it's not true that the state plans are the same as the Obama proposal, we win nothing by continuing to insist that they are the same.

      If they're different (which seems to be the case if O'Donnell's reporting is accurate), then we make the argument that those differences do not outweigh a woman's right to contraceptive health care.

      •  Don't be fooled (5+ / 0-)

        The distinctions they are trying to point between the state and federal laws either don't exist or are meaningless.  In Colorado, Catholic Charities tells O'Donnell they aren't required to cover birth control. Well, sure, if they want to drop their health coverage rather than cover birth control, they can do that.   That's the same as federal law.  The suggestion in the video that it's different is highly misleading.

        In the Georgia example, the exemption O'Donnell cites is that the law only applies to employers who offer Rx coverage.  So if a Catholic hospital doesn't want to cover birth control, they can opt out by not covering any Rx for their employers.  Under the proposed Obama rule, there is no employer mandate -- so if the Catholic church still doesn't want to cover Rx, they can still opt out by not providing health coverage for their employees.  

        That's a distinction, but it's really not a difference.  It's just misleading spin from the Catholic Church.

        "Journalistic conventions make it hard for reporters to deal with a big, complicated lie." -- Michael Kinsley.

        by dcg2 on Fri Feb 10, 2012 at 08:14:11 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

    •  Don't be mislead by spin (6+ / 0-)

      He is saying the difference is that there is no mandate to provide prescription drug coverage in Georgia (but that if you do provide Rx coverage, it has to include birth control), whereas he says the Federal law makes no such exemption.

      However, the Federal law makes no mandate that employers cover insurance. So just as Georgia employers could choose to drop their Rx coverage if they don't want to cover birth control, so too could any American employer drop their health coverage if they don't want to cover birth control.

      Then, let's take Colorado.  He gets a highly misleading statement from "Catholic Charities" in Colorado and he takes it as gospel. The statement says "Under Colorado law, Catholic Charities is not required to provide contraception and sterilization coverage to its employees."  Well, ok then.

      But under Federal law there is no requirement to that any employer cover it either. The rule only applies if Catholic charity chooses to provide health coverage, just like in Colorado.    Seems to be like very slippery wording from Catholic Charities to make it seem like there is a difference.

      In fact, best as I can tell, both examples O'Donnell cites are, at best, distinctions without differences.  

      "Journalistic conventions make it hard for reporters to deal with a big, complicated lie." -- Michael Kinsley.

      by dcg2 on Fri Feb 10, 2012 at 08:10:18 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  I am not sure I understand your case... (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        I love OCD
        However, the Federal law makes no mandate that employers cover insurance.
        That is ACA itself?  There is a mandate for employers with over 50 employees.  So with the new law, the Georgia loophole wouldn't apply.

        Can you clarify?

        "But once John Boehner is sworn in as Speaker, then he’s going to have responsibilities to govern. You can’t just stand on the sidelines and be a bomb thrower." - President Obama, 12-07-2010

        by justmy2 on Fri Feb 10, 2012 at 08:14:44 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  There's no mandate (4+ / 0-)

          Large employers don't have to cover health care, though if they choose not to they would pay a $2,000 fee per employee (excluding the first 30) to help offset the cost of the government subsidizing care for employees who would be forced into the individual market.  

          So technically, if a Catholic Hospital in Georgia doesn't want to cover birth control for their employees, there is absolutely nothing in the new rule that can require them to do so - basically the same as Georgia.

          This is from the White House, so feel free to take with a grain of salt

          The Affordable Care Act does not include an employer
          mandate. In 2014, as a matter of fairness, the Affordable
          Care Act requires large employers to pay a shared
          responsibility fee only if they don’t provide affordable
          coverage and taxpayers are supporting the cost of health
          insurance for their workers through premium tax credits
          for middle to low income families.

          • The law specifically exempts all firms that have fewer
          than 50 employees – 96 percent of all firms in the United
          States or 5.8 million out of 6 million total firms – from
          any employer responsibility requirements. These 5.8
          million firms employ nearly 34 million workers. More
          than 96 percent of firms with 50 or more employees
          already offer health insurance to their workers. Less
          than 0.2 percent of all firms (about 10,000 out of 6
          million) may face employer responsibility requirements.
          Many firms that do not currently offer coverage will be
          more likely to do so because of lower premiums and
          wider choices in the Exchange.
          > For more information, please visit:
          www.healthreform.gov/about/answers.html.

          "Journalistic conventions make it hard for reporters to deal with a big, complicated lie." -- Michael Kinsley.

          by dcg2 on Fri Feb 10, 2012 at 08:26:09 AM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  that was always the case...it was part of the (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            I love OCD

            complaint...they were concerned about the fines...that still constitutes a mandate....it is just the penalty for not following it...

            as the rule was written, this was still the case...whereas in GA, if the company chose not to provide prescription drugs, they would not be fined.

            that is the difference....

            "But once John Boehner is sworn in as Speaker, then he’s going to have responsibilities to govern. You can’t just stand on the sidelines and be a bomb thrower." - President Obama, 12-07-2010

            by justmy2 on Fri Feb 10, 2012 at 08:47:01 AM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  You are grasping here. (0+ / 0-)

              Under the federal law, like the Georgia law, they do not have to cover birth control if they don't want.  All they have to do is drop their insurance coverage.  

              Now if their problem is that they want to be able to drop health coverage without having to contribute one nickel to solve our national health care crisis -- then that's what they should be complaining about.

              This is a false issue, and the Georgia example proves it -- because neither the Georgia law or the Federal law one forces them to provide coverage.

              "Journalistic conventions make it hard for reporters to deal with a big, complicated lie." -- Michael Kinsley.

              by dcg2 on Fri Feb 10, 2012 at 01:14:29 PM PST

              [ Parent ]

              •  if you are arguing about the word mandate (0+ / 0-)

                feel free, but I didn't realize that was your intent.

                All I know is that at the federal level, you will be fined if you provide no coverage AND that coverage MUST provide prescription drugs coverage including contraception.  

                In Georgia,  you will be fined if you provide no coverage AND that coverage AND CAN CHOOSE to provide prescription drugs thus not providing contraception.

                That is a very specific difference that O'Donnell was correct to point out.

                "But once John Boehner is sworn in as Speaker, then he’s going to have responsibilities to govern. You can’t just stand on the sidelines and be a bomb thrower." - President Obama, 12-07-2010

                by justmy2 on Fri Feb 10, 2012 at 01:30:50 PM PST

                [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (146)
  • Community (56)
  • Baltimore (38)
  • Civil Rights (36)
  • Bernie Sanders (33)
  • Culture (28)
  • Elections (28)
  • Economy (27)
  • Law (24)
  • Texas (23)
  • 2016 (21)
  • Rescued (20)
  • Environment (19)
  • Labor (19)
  • Hillary Clinton (18)
  • Education (18)
  • Freddie Gray (16)
  • Media (16)
  • Barack Obama (16)
  • Racism (16)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site