Skip to main content

View Diary: Dear Lance: It's Not About The Bike (33 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I guess (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    expatjourno

    you can  ridicule my decision to use the word drugs as opposed to actually listing various blood doping techniques, anabolic steroids, any number of other drugs which have therapeutic uses but can be abused not to treat disease but to enhance performance, etc.   But nowhere did I suggest that drug testing was perfect, that false positives don't occur,  etc.  Would you rather that high school coaches trying to make it to a college team based on the efforts of the kids were encouraging abuse of performance enhancing drugs and no one did anything about it, even knowing that testing isn't perfect?

    I clearly acknowledged that there would be no one in the peleton to give Lance's titles to,  doping was endemic, and has been for a long time.

    Landis is a lot less of a person than I once thought him to be.  I tried hard to believe he was clean the year he won the Tour, but eventually evidence has to take precedence over faith or wishes.  He is and has clearly been after money to replace what he lost for quite a while.  To the extent whistle blower laws exist, I am ok with that, long term I think they do more good than bad.

    Lance simply is not innocent but neither was he the only person to break the rules using performance enhancements. He rode while doping and beat a bunch of other dopers. For that reason I am pretty much of the opinion that it is actually meaningless and petty to strip him of his titles at this point.  

    But  that won't erase all the good he did and still does in the cancer community.  If he lost his titles then maybe every title from the Tour for at least the last 100 years should be revoked, too.  That's the problem with organized sports at a high level.  As the NASCAR people say "If you aren't cheatin', you aren't tryin'"  The system corrupts the participants and corrupt participants ensures the system remains corrupt.

    •  I don't think she was ridiculing your use of the (0+ / 0-)

      word drugs. But more of how "many" things can be caught under that label.

      •  The testing at the Tour (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        TexDem

        And UCLA's lab in the US for example is no superficial level of testing.  It is unlikely to mistake a poppy seed for something else.  I spent a lot of time reading up on the tests, at cycling boards etc where this was huge, papers published on the research, etc.

        •  The anecdotal story of her son is from 10 years (0+ / 0-)

          ago. That son is now a MD.

          I sure as hell hope the testing of athletes on an international level are more efficient than those performed by a HS 10 years ago. Her son was called to the office and explained to a very relieved Principal about his poppy-seed muffin.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site