Skip to main content

View Diary: NY Times reporter asks President question that NY Times deems not newsworthy (116 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Argument shouldn't be 'either / or' (0+ / 0-)

    The environmental risks / challenges should be discussed as supportive of moves that will pay off even if the environmental weren't part of the equation. But, how can you talk about solutions if you don't talk about the problem to be solved?

    Blogging regularly at Get Energy Smart NOW! for a sustainable energy future.

    by A Siegel on Thu Nov 15, 2012 at 04:08:29 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  I'm not saying either or (0+ / 0-)

      I'm just saying the most efficient means likely will be economical arguments

      •  Reacted to 'not ... but ..." (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        duhban

        The combination is absolutely acceptable / preferred on multiple grounds.  I see it quite possible to create strong climate policy that creates huge economic benefits compared to BAU.  See here for why.

        Blogging regularly at Get Energy Smart NOW! for a sustainable energy future.

        by A Siegel on Thu Nov 15, 2012 at 04:56:23 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site