Skip to main content

View Diary: Take a Hard Line: We Should be Rolling Back the REAGAN Tax Cuts for the Rich, Not Just Bush (54 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  This is a balanced approach to deficit reduction. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Roger Fox, chmood

    It's been so unbalanced in favor of tax cuts for so long that only massive tax increases on the wealthy can bring back any semblance of balance.  Any claim that we have to sacrifice SS and Medicare to "balance" out some tiny tax increase on the rich is just nonsense.  There is no reason not to massively increase taxes on the wealthy, and every reason to do so.  

    So you need to decide whether your politics are reality-based or just another example of the centrist, Overton Window-driven jellyfish politics that leaves Americans perpetually on the verge of poverty every time a Republican gets put in office and reverses your "balanced approach" with a wave of their hand.

    The President can use whatever rhetoric he deems fit, but the objective of this Party is to restore sanity and decency to the tax code.  That means huge tax increases on the wealthy.  Nothing else can rebuild this country.

    "They fear this man. They know he will see farther than they, and he will bind them with ancient logics." -The stoner guy in The Cabin in the Woods

    by Troubadour on Thu Nov 15, 2012 at 11:49:55 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  That person seems to be advocating (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Troubadour, trumpeter

      for continued slow GDP growth, low job creation numbers and increasing income and wealth disparity.

      And thats the best way to hold the Democratic coalition together.......

      Must be snark.....

      FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.

      by Roger Fox on Thu Nov 15, 2012 at 12:23:28 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site