Skip to main content

View Diary: Would an abortion have saved Savita Halappanavar? (72 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  OK - that clarifies it - except (0+ / 0-)

    with the emergence of hospital superbugs antibiotics may be less effective now than they were 37 ears ago. Either way death by septicemia is now so rare it has to be investigated when it occurs. The issue is whether there was medical malpractice - even within the terms of the hospital approved protocols - or whether it was the failure to offer an abortion which most likely  caused the infection - in which case it is the RC church and the "right to life" crowd who stand indicted

    •  Or if... (3+ / 0-)

      the baby dying inside her was a tax on an already overstressed system and inhibited her ability to fight off the infection. Then she may have been saved by the abortion even if the baby wasn't causing the abortion.

      The point is, she was miscarrying when she came in, that was stated from everything I've seen, diagnosed on day on. They let that woman suffer and die instead of helping her. There was NO CHANCE of saving that baby. There was a chance of saving her. In my book, that makes those doctor's guilty of at least negligence and manslaughter. Of course I'm not the law in Ireland. But that isn't going to change my opinion of what happened.

      I'm just glad my mother was save, and my sisters were born. And I'll do everything in my power to make sure that future mothers are saved.

      "Madness! Total and complete madness! This never would've happened if the humans hadn't started fighting one another!" Londo Mollari

      by FloridaSNMOM on Tue Nov 20, 2012 at 05:37:45 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Septicemia is not rare (4+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      crose, FloridaSNMOM, Mrs M, Pandoras Box

      See "blood poisoning."
      E. coli bacteria are not rare either.
      See "Jack in the Box death."

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site