Skip to main content

View Diary: Julian Castro for VP behind Hillary (100 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Agreed (7+ / 0-)

    If Elizabeth Warren runs, she would be the person I support.

    I'm looking for someone who will continue the progress made by the Obama administration, but also improve where President Obama has been imperfect (in other words civil liberties, drug wars, secrecy of drones, etc). I'd also want someone who is pragmatic (for this reason, I would not support someone like Kucinich or Gravel). Elizabeth Warren fits all three of those, and I will strongly support her should she run.

    Republicans are far more socialist than Democrats. Just because they want to redistribute the wealth upwards does not make it any better.

    by MrAnon on Thu Nov 22, 2012 at 02:34:12 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  I defnitely want Warren in the mix (0+ / 0-)

      but I don't yet have nearly enough information to say she would be the best choice.  She's certainly gifted and bold enough to be president, but campaigning on a national stage is another matter altogether.  There's also the fact that she might not want to be president - at least not that soon after entering political life.  

      But I absolutely would want her to run so we can find out what she's capable of as a nationwide campaigner.  In fact, I want as many good people as possible running - we have to avoid falling back into the Insider Mediocrity business no matter what.

      "They fear this man. They know he will see farther than they, and he will bind them with ancient logics." -The stoner guy in The Cabin in the Woods

      by Troubadour on Thu Nov 22, 2012 at 03:35:53 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Now THAT is someone who is definitely (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      sebastianguy99, MBishop1, Wee Mama

      not qualified at this point, and shouldn't even be talked about. Castro's been a mere mayor? Right now, Warren has been a mere NOTHING. At this point, I can guarantee that Elizabeth Warren is not a candidate I would support and she's not a candidate that could win. She's just not, right now, any rational kind of good candidate, just because she's all dreamy to a certain cadre of progressives.

      I want to see actual accomplishments in elected office.

      Jon Husted is a dick.

      by anastasia p on Thu Nov 22, 2012 at 04:23:22 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Warren has done way more than Castro (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Wee Mama, MrAnon

        She proposed, lobbied for, and set up an important federal agency (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau), she chaired the congressional oversight panel of TARP. By 2016, she will have as much senate experience as Barack Obama.

        Hillary Clinton is experienced, but what does she believe in? It seems to me like she's another slippery, say anything politician like Bill and will likely embrace neoliberal economics of Bill (deregulation, capital gains tax cuts, welfare reform etc), and will most likely continue the interventionist foreign policy and breakdown of civil liberties that started under Bush.

        Unless you can convince me that Hillary Clinton will fight for progressive values, I'll say no thanks.

        "Poor man wanna be rich, Rich man wanna be King, and the King ain't satisfied till he rules everything." Bruce Springsteen.

        by Johnnythebandit on Thu Nov 22, 2012 at 08:26:38 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

      •  A "nothing"? (0+ / 0-)

        By 2016, Warren will have more experience than Obama had in 2008. Not only will she have served 4 years in the Senate, she will have worked in building the CFPB and being tasked with overseeing TARP.

        Republicans are far more socialist than Democrats. Just because they want to redistribute the wealth upwards does not make it any better.

        by MrAnon on Fri Nov 23, 2012 at 05:52:58 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site