Skip to main content

View Diary: Well Now. Muslim Brotherhood HQs across Egypt are being torched by protesters this morning. (247 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  God, but this is stupid timing for him! (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    auron renouille, Jim Domenico

    I agree with what you say here. But this is idiotic timing because he was just in better with the International community than ever before due to yesterday, and now he's probably in worst standing. To move outside of the regional issues and look to what this has done to his global standing, because the International community is not impressed by this attempt to get rid of multiple Governmental branches so that he can run a dictatorship, more or less...

    Such -- SUCH -- a stupid move! I was thinking yesterday that he might have support from the world community. Today, no way.

    •  Idiotic timing? (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      FistJab, JesseCW

      The last poll on record had him at 70 percent approval.  Why assume Morsi doesn't have political capital to spend?

      •  I am specifically referring to International (0+ / 0-)

        standing. Right now, he is poised to assert his role as a dictator, period. So far, that's not how he's run things, nor is it how he campaigned. Since Egypt is the second largest recipient of U.S. funds, and since we don't support dictatorships, it does not bode well for continued support for Egypt. If he doesn't want those funds, that's fine, but the Egyptian economy is down, not up, and the living index isn't looking good (and some of our aid is humanitarian relief aid). Tourism is a huge chunk of Egypt's business, and that's hanging on by a thread, although Morsi promised to rebuild it to boost the economy.

        He was voted in at 51%. I don't know his approval rating. Do you have that link?

        We don't know what that looks like right now either since there is opposition, plain and simple. Granted, it's probably not majority opposition. But will it become so IF Egypt loses almost 2 billion dollars a year from the U.S. plus gets smacked by the U.N. and also is chastised (doubtlessly will happen) by other nations too?

        Thus, I contend that this is a politically poor calculation.

        •  A quick Google reveals (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:

          tons of articles which condemn Morsi from his SUPPORTERS as well as opponents for threatening the success of the Arab Spring Revolution. The tones are far more dire than anything I've said, and again, this is from his supporters. In Egypt.

        •  By international, do you mean you? (0+ / 0-)

          Or perhaps a Chosen One who you hope shares your point of view?

          •  What? I mean the U.N. at the very least. EOM (0+ / 0-)
          •  You do know that the ascription of motivations (0+ / 0-)

            to people you don't know is a classical logical fallacy, do you not? It's a form of ad hominem, FWIW.

            Try this: don't try to guess what other people are motivated by; instead, ask them from a position of sincerity. I infer, but could be wrong, that you somehow think that I support Morsi's bid for Dictatorship when, in fact, I am appalled by it and have made that clear in my comments. If you have questions for me, kindly ask them. Do not put words in my mouth or jump to conclusions that fit your narrative about "supporters," of which I wouldn't count myself amongst if he is, in fact, gunning for dictator status as it seems.

        •  HHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA (0+ / 0-)
          and since we don't support dictatorships


          I never knew how dry your wit could be.

          I apologize for underestimating you.

          "the Agency continues to verify the non-diversion of declared material at these facilities and LOFs."

          by JesseCW on Sat Nov 24, 2012 at 01:02:49 AM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  It should read as "openly" (0+ / 0-)

            Obviously the United States has enabled more dictatorships -- as quietly as possible -- than I can count. As for open support for the notion of a dictatorship? We don't respond well to that because it does open up inquiry into some of our more problematic policies to both the American electorate AND the International community. I can appreciate that my comment was not specific enough here and understand, upon re-reading, how it could be misconstrued.

            •  Right. Bahrain? We're really subtle about our (0+ / 0-)


              Jordan? Saudi Arabia?

              I don't think I really need to go on.  From Pinochet to Suharto to Mubarak to Abdullah II , we support and have supported dictators very openly.

              "the Agency continues to verify the non-diversion of declared material at these facilities and LOFs."

              by JesseCW on Sat Nov 24, 2012 at 04:04:46 PM PST

              [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site