Skip to main content

View Diary: "Drone Rule Book": It Doesn't Exist, Except on the New York Times' Front Page (115 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I must point out the obvious, maybe I missed (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    something in this thread but drones use whom again? Some kid in Iowa sitting behind a computer screen, right?  What real danger is he/she in? Not getting his pizza delivered before his shift ends?

    Drones do not equal aircraft carriers or jets or even CIA operatives within a foreign country.  

    Soon, or most likely now, we won't need those kids playing video games in Iowa to do the dirty work, we'll have it all automated with computers.

    Then tell me the nature of war wouldn't have changed, for the worse.

    -7.62; -5.95 The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.~Tesla

    by gerrilea on Mon Nov 26, 2012 at 11:54:47 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  Compared to what? (0+ / 0-)

      Are UCAV operators at less risk than fixed wing aviators?  Certainly.  Then again, how much risk do the flyboys take on these days anyway?  Injury and death in the course of these duties is rare and getting rarer.  UCAVs aren't a fundamental shift, but a continuation of a trend that has already significantly decimated the risk faced by operators in certain specialties.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site