Skip to main content

View Diary: The Squandered Potential of Occupy (240 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  On a more fundamental level, (8+ / 0-)

    it seems that you implicitly support a centralized hierarchical model of social and political organization.

    Hierarchical, centralized political and social models have their benefits and it's flaws. Decentralized political and social models also have their benefits and flaws.

    An authoritarian one-size-fits-all model of politics, while effective for 19th and 20th century politics, often over-simplifies an increasingly complex social and economic zeitgeist.

    In the end, why should Occupy scale up into a centralized, hierarchical 19th century style political organization where a handful of charismatic personalities and careerists hold sway? Don't we have enough of those already?

    •  But the purpose is... (5+ / 0-)

      ... to get stuff done. A decentralized organization is a means to an end. Lots of people in Occupy saw the decentralized organization as an end in and of itself.

      Maybe centralized political organizations with leaders and clear goals exist because they are more effective than the alternative.

    •  The American people are not against "hierarchy." (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      jds1978, Constantine, cal2010

      They're against having no say in anything, and being forced to work more for something less than a minimum living.  This is what I'm talking about.  Being decentralized is not what made Occupy strong - its message and passion were. The non-hierarchical stuff was just an anarchist fetish nobody else gave a shit about, and they let that take everything over.

      In Roviet Union, money spends YOU!

      by Troubadour on Sun Dec 02, 2012 at 08:19:49 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site