Skip to main content

View Diary: What the New York Times Missed in Its 1st Article on Manning's Torture Hearing (32 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Okay agreed, but for different "legal" reasons. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ER Doc, Heart of the Rockies

    "enemy combatants" have no rights and it appears that neither do citizens...

    The Fourth Circuit finally settled the matter in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 316 F.3d 450 (4th Cir. 2003), when it ruled that a U.S. citizen captured with enemy forces during a combat operation in a foreign country could be held as an enemy combatant.
    Immigration law experts wonder whether two recent cases signal a growing focus on using loss of citizenship as a sanction against suspected criminals and terrorists.
    -cut-
    Under current law, the government may not revoke the citizenship of a person born here. But in naturalization cases, the law does not guarantee citizenship is forever.
    Amendment XIV

    Section 1.

    All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

    Section 5.

    The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

    Dangerous times we live in.

    -7.62; -5.95 The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.~Tesla

    by gerrilea on Sat Dec 08, 2012 at 04:26:00 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site