Skip to main content

View Diary: Is David Gregory in trouble over 30 round magzine? (84 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  While I am completely against (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    a2nite, annecros, phonegery

    these none sense gun regulations, they should still at least fine David.  Whether I agree with a law or not isn't the issue.  It was still against the law (an absurd one at that).

    •  Huh? (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      nellgwen

      So, it's nonsense to have a 30 round clip banned in a community?

      Gandhi's Seven Sins: Wealth without work; Pleasure without conscience; Knowledge without character; Commerce without morality; Science without humanity; Worship without sacrifice; Politics without principle

      by Chris Reeves on Wed Dec 26, 2012 at 11:31:54 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  The absurd part (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        annecros, BlackSheep1

        Is trying to declare a tube with a spring in it to be contraband and calling it an "assault weapon".

        Since owning parts for an "assault weapon" is itself illegal, the law taken literally would allow locking someone up for owning a spring.

        •  It's more complicated than that (0+ / 0-)

          It's specifically designed to fit only one purpose, and thus the ban.  You can't just put a box with a spring in it and have it work; it's engineered to serve only one purpose, as an extension of a weapon.

          And bans of items for any purpose are really within government provisions as long as the populace consent.  

          It's a bit like saying:  "I don't understand why Kansas bans Bottlerockets but they allow for Roman candles and M80s".   Well, they do because that's how the law was crafted and that's what people agreed to.

          And that's the only thing that matters.  :)

          Gandhi's Seven Sins: Wealth without work; Pleasure without conscience; Knowledge without character; Commerce without morality; Science without humanity; Worship without sacrifice; Politics without principle

          by Chris Reeves on Wed Dec 26, 2012 at 12:20:16 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  Banning the gun was enough; (0+ / 0-)

            banning clips was ridiculous overkill.  One could own 1,000 clips but they'd all be useless without the right gun to load them into.  The government may have had the power, but exercising it to this degree was just idiocy.

            Still, Gregory was a bigger idiot in that he could have just held up a picture.  Now he's made a fool of himself, and whether or not he's actually charged (which he should be), he'll spend a boatload of money in attorney's fees.  And shot himself in the foot, so to speak, PR-wise too.  NBC is probably not too happy, either.

            "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and I am not sure about the universe." -- Albert Einstein

            by Neuroptimalian on Wed Dec 26, 2012 at 08:19:58 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

      •  Yes (0+ / 0-)

        Banning weapons that account for a tiny fraction of gun deaths while allowing people shot guns and hand guns (the huge percentage of gun deaths are due to these 2 styles of weapons) is silly.

        AR's may look "Scary" but they are very nice varmit hunting tools and great range rifles.  They have tiny caliber bullets so they are fun and easy to shoot.  A .223 caliber bullet is incedibly tiny compaired to my big game rifles.

        This is why a proposed ban on AR's is silly.  You won't reduce gun violence by a fraction of a percent while you would be pissing off a huge voting bloc of hunters and range shooters.  It's a lose-lose.

    •  I think the exact opposite (0+ / 0-)

      the regulation makes sense, except as applied in this instance.  They should keep the law but exercise the better part of valor.

      Difficult, difficult, lemon difficult.

      by Loge on Wed Dec 26, 2012 at 03:12:05 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site