Skip to main content

View Diary: Why is "touching Social Security" in any manner a bad thing? (142 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  "Touching" social security (0+ / 0-)

    May not be for the worse (see the Begich proposal). What part of this is so difficult for people to understand?

    Republicans are far more socialist than Democrats. Just because they want to redistribute the wealth upwards does not make it any better.

    by MrAnon on Thu Jan 03, 2013 at 03:13:54 PM PST

    •  Here's a way for you to understand it. (0+ / 0-)

      How many ways can you spell NO?

      It is time to #Occupy Media.

      by lunachickie on Thu Jan 03, 2013 at 07:49:25 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Do you even know what the Begich proposal is? (0+ / 0-)

        It EXPANDS Social Security benefits, and removes the payroll tax cap, making Social Security solvent for decades more to come.

        I wonder sometimes whether you people want Social Security to go insolvent 20 years from now.

        Republicans are far more socialist than Democrats. Just because they want to redistribute the wealth upwards does not make it any better.

        by MrAnon on Fri Jan 04, 2013 at 12:23:50 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site