Skip to main content

View Diary: US already has high elder poverty rate, so why are Social Security cuts even on the table? (223 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  we're talking about hypotheticals, no? (0+ / 0-)

    so what should i cite besides news stories?  everything i've read says they would leave SSI/SSDI alone.

    but one can discuss social security itself without the statements applying to SSI/SSDI.

    However, it really comes down to fed law, and what the law says.
    yup.  so if CCPI is enacted and the law states that SSI/SSDI are exempt?

    Please don't dominate the rap, Jack, if you got nothin' new to say - Grateful Dead

    by Cedwyn on Tue Jan 15, 2013 at 05:55:16 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  then I'll keep screaming (7+ / 0-)

      because if I were a "I-got-mine-jack-screw-you" type, I'd be a Republican.

      There is a long trending history of this sort with veteran benefits as people who tried to cut benefits pitted one generation of vets against another, as we saw with the new GI Bill.  Now they employ the same strategy against Social Security

      But since Social Security is a signature Democratic program and since solidarity is a signature Democratic principle - I'll keep screaming

      Don't be a dick, be a Democrat! Oppose CPI cuts! Support Social Security and Veteran Benefits!

      by Jeffersonian Democrat on Tue Jan 15, 2013 at 06:05:43 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  VA has been expanded lots recently (0+ / 0-)

        it's immune from the sequester.  anyhoo, if i meant SSI/SSDI, i'd say SSI/SSDI.  if i say SS, i mean SS and only SS.  

        and i have always qualified that any switch to CCPI would have to afford protection to those who need it.  i have also advocated expanding SSI/SSDI eligibility.  i don't think those programs should be touched otherwise, and i don't think they should switch the tax code to CCPI.  the programs don't use the same metric now; i don't see why they have to.

        feel silly for assuming things about me yet?  

        Please don't dominate the rap, Jack, if you got nothin' new to say - Grateful Dead

        by Cedwyn on Tue Jan 15, 2013 at 06:12:07 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  again, VA has a long history (4+ / 0-)

          at first it was Korean vs. WWII vets with cuts
          Then Korean & WWII were pitted against Vietnam vets

          And you are right, VA has been expanded a lot recently with most of the programs only affecting OIF/OEF veterans since 2001, essentially creating a two-tier vet system.

          And no, you can't speak about CCPI and only speak about Soc Sec and not SSDI, Railroad Pensions, military retirement, VA benefits because all of them are governed by the same United States Code .  There is no separation.

          Hopefully, we're talking about hypotheticals that will never come to fruition because enough people raise a stink, but don't expect programs under the radar to be spared when no one speaks up for them.  Most people do not know that CPI governs VA, most people think we are speaking about something that affects the elderly and who cares about them.  Part of that is from information like you put out in diary after diary.

          And because you put these neo-liberal OFA points out in diary after diary I certainly do not feel silly

          Don't be a dick, be a Democrat! Oppose CPI cuts! Support Social Security and Veteran Benefits!

          by Jeffersonian Democrat on Tue Jan 15, 2013 at 06:45:33 AM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  again, though (0+ / 0-)

            it all depends on how the law is written, hey?

            Please don't dominate the rap, Jack, if you got nothin' new to say - Grateful Dead

            by Cedwyn on Tue Jan 15, 2013 at 06:58:25 AM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  What's your cite? (4+ / 0-)

              What's the quibble over how a law is written when you're pushing cuts to programs for poor elderly and disabled people, including veterans?

              What's the point in showing excessive cruelty by taking money from poor people when there's no need to do so?

              What kind of depravity of the soul does it take to push for unnecessary cuts to those less fortunate simply to please some mentally diseased wealthy corporate donors?

              Democratic Leaders must be very clear they stand with the working class of our country. Democrats must hold the line in demanding that deficit reduction is done fairly -- not on the backs of the elderly, the sick, children and the poor.

              by Betty Pinson on Tue Jan 15, 2013 at 07:39:57 AM PST

              [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site