Skip to main content

View Diary: Instead of "Assault Weapons", how about a fire-rate restriction? (173 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Sorry, can't get on board with that. (0+ / 0-)

    I do not agree that if something is stolen from you, when meeting a minimum standard of protection against it, that you should be held liable for any misuse that arises from it after it's stolen...and i seriously doubt that any court would find that a reasonable requirement.  

    I see what you did there.

    by GoGoGoEverton on Mon Jan 21, 2013 at 02:33:01 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  Constitutional (0+ / 0-)

      The court just gets to decide if the requirement is Constitutional, reasonable is for the Legislature to decide.

      If the middle ground is no liability if a gun is stolen out of a properly locked gun safe I could live with that, provided the theft is promptly reported.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site