Skip to main content

View Diary: The clear way forward on filibuster reform: The constitutional option (105 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Will the proposal - yet to be seen - require 41... (0+ / 0-)

    ... continual presences on the floor?

    But even if it does, wouldn't that necessitate the majority having at least that many, plus one, on the floor or very nearby at all times? Otherwise, anyone could call the question and vote.

    Why do I doubt that that this archaic, ossified, anti-deliberative body - where members of both parties and independents cherish the value of No! - would require what we think it would require? Just sayin'.

    2014 IS COMING. Build up the Senate. Win back the House : 17 seats. Plus!

    by TRPChicago on Wed Jan 23, 2013 at 02:10:47 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site