Skip to main content

View Diary: Veteran Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin to retire after the 2014 elections (287 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Levin (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    I've been largely tolerant of the guy, because he's pretty reliable on some issues, but when it comes to foreign policy and national security, you never quite know where he's going to be.  I'd hardly call him a hawk, but on domestic security, he's not where I want him to be most of the time.  I've really been waiting for him to retire.  

    BTW, whoever said that he is more liberal than Granholm is crazy.  She wasn't allowed to be anywhere as liberal as she wanted to be with the Michigan Senate blocking just about anything she ever wanted, and the so-called Democratic Speaker of the House (Andy Dillon) barely able to hide his contempt for her.  With friends like Bishop and Andy Dillon, who was supposedly in her party, she didn't need any other enemies.  In the Senate, I'd trust her to be a very solid liberal vote.  

    That said, I don't get the feeling she ever wants to see Michigan, again, and I could completely understand.  The inherent sexism in most of the critiques of her, right and left, have been disgusting.  While it would have been nice to see her fight for more of what she wanted, I understand why she didn't given that this has got to be one of the most bought-and-paid for state senates in the country despite it being a blue state.

    Anyway, I wouldn't lose any sleep if Levin decided to retire is what I'm saying, and that's putting it nicely.

    •  Granholm (0+ / 0-)

      I never got the impression that Granholm was resentful toward Michigan.  I think she just followed an opportunity.  There was really no where for her to go politically in MI unless Levin was to retire (which I doubt he will).  If Levin was to retire, I really hope Granholm would consider returning to MI and running for the senate.  I also trust that she would be a solidly liberal vote.    

      •  Didn't Mean (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        I didn't mean for it to come across that I believe she was a jobber as governor and would leave us in a hot minute, rather, I could completely understanding if she never wanted to come back given how she was treated.  I always knew it was going to be hard to govern a state whose economy was createring before the the financial crash of 2008; what I never quite expected was the kind of vitrial released against her by her opponents, and even more to the point, how willing Dems were to throw her under the bus and even a lot of veiled sexism in their critque.  Can't tell you how many Dems I knew that engaged in this kind of stuff and it really disappointed me.

        I'd vote for her for sure if she ever wanted to run for anything, and I think she still has enough good will with time removed from her term that she'd almost certainly be able to capture a Senate seat, but I could completely understand her if she never wanted to see this place again.

        •  Oh, I see (0+ / 0-)

          I completely agree....Granholm was treated poorly.  It was so disappointing to see Dems throw her under the bus during the 2010 governors race.  Fieger (during his "I might run" period of 2010) was the only Dem who had the guts to stand up for Granholm and point out the difficult economic and political circumstances she faced.  There was a brief moment where I actually wanted him to be the nominee again.

          Granholm is definitely a strong candidate who I think could overcome her low approval ratings as governor.  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site