Skip to main content

View Diary: Stop saying Republican electoral-vote rigging is constitutional. It's not. Here's why. (193 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Of course they are (3+ / 0-)

    That's why Caitlin Halligan has been waiting since 2010 - delayed, stalled, filibustered, and delayed again.

    http://www.nytimes.com/...

    Senate Republicans on Tuesday blocked confirmation of Caitlin J. Halligan, a prominent New York lawyer, to be a federal appeals court judge, raising the question of whether a political deal to prevent the filibuster of most judicial nominations has broken down.

    Democrats failed to pick up the 60 votes needed under Senate rules to break a filibuster of a confirmation vote for Ms. Halligan, a former New York State solicitor general. The vote to break the filibuster was 54 to 45 and was largely along party lines;

    Filibuster reform now. No more Gentleman's agreements.

    by bear83 on Tue Jan 29, 2013 at 03:19:48 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  But isn't one of the new, watered down filibuster (0+ / 0-)

      reform principles that non-appellate judicial nominations and those below cabinet level are not subject to the filibuster?  Or is that just a "gentlemen's agreement?"  If so, rotsa ruck.

      President Barack Hussein Obama!!

      by NM Ward Chair on Wed Jan 30, 2013 at 01:42:36 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (146)
  • Community (77)
  • Baltimore (77)
  • Freddie Gray (57)
  • Bernie Sanders (54)
  • Civil Rights (45)
  • Elections (38)
  • Culture (34)
  • Media (32)
  • Hillary Clinton (31)
  • 2016 (29)
  • Law (28)
  • Racism (25)
  • Environment (23)
  • Education (22)
  • Labor (22)
  • Republicans (22)
  • Politics (20)
  • Police Brutality (19)
  • Barack Obama (19)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site