Skip to main content

View Diary: Stop saying Republican electoral-vote rigging is constitutional. It's not. Here's why. (193 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  well that position (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Sparhawk

    is intellectually more defensible.  I can't say there's anything wrong with that position, but my personal belief is that it's very likely constitutional, and I don't think opponents would be able to gather the necessary arguments to get cert granted at the Supremes unless the law were written in such a way that it's either facially unfair (highly unlikely), or that affects a group other than political parties (race, sex, etc).

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site