Skip to main content

View Diary: WITNESS: The Brutal Asymmetry of the Israeli Occupation as Soldiers Pepper Spray Seated Villagers (180 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  What does this mean? (8+ / 0-)
    I support Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state
    What happens if natural demographic trends result in Israel no longer having a Jewish majority?

    "I have often seen people uncivil by too much civility, and tiresome in their courtesy." Michel de Montaigne

    by JesseCW on Sun Feb 03, 2013 at 02:29:07 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  I don't have a solution for everything (4+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Tom Anderson, elwior, Emmy, kyril

      I think the Jews have a right to their historic homeland, just as Tibetans have a right to theirs. I don't know how the Tibetans, if they ever get to return, will work things out with the ethnic Chinese who have been moving in, and I don't know the best way to work things out for Israel either. But creating a Palestinian state seems like a positive step forward.

      Please visit: http://www.jkmediasource.org

      by Noisy Democrat on Sun Feb 03, 2013 at 11:42:44 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  But the Palestinians don't? (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Fire bad tree pretty, elwior, poco

        Because you do realize that they are being kept from their land as it has been annexed by Israel.

        The only way that Israel can be majority Jewish and exist on the specific territory it exists on is through ethnic cleansing.  Israel as it exists now is the result of ethnic cleansing and that ethnic cleansing continues to this day.

        •  I said that a Palestinian state (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          elwior, AoT

          needs to be established. The original partition plan created two states. Even though the Arabs rejected that plan back in 1948, it isn't too late to go for a two-state solution. But Israel needs to dismantle the settlements.

          Please visit: http://www.jkmediasource.org

          by Noisy Democrat on Sun Feb 03, 2013 at 07:48:39 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  The partition plan (3+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            AoT, JesseCW, poco

            denied the rights of the Palestinians to to self-determination. Palestinian Muslims and Christians were a majority in the 1940s and yet the minority Jews were given half the land. Of course it was rejected. And it was only accepted by Ben Gurion not because it was acceptable but because they had plans to to acquire more.

          •  Yeah. I figured that was what was underneath (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            Fire bad tree pretty

            your comment.

            Not surprised.

            Israeli Terrorists murdered UN representatives, including one who had saved thousands of Jews from Nazi death camps, until they got the lopsided plan they wanted.

            Why should 2/3rds of the population have accepted a plan they had no part in creating, which gave more than half their land to 1/3rd of the population?

            Not quietly accepting theft is, in your mind, so unreasonable as to justify further theft?

            There is no possibility of a vote held prior to the massive ethnic cleansing carried out in 1948/49 resulting in the "Jewish State" you believe has a right to exist - a right that we can now see you consider superior to all other rights.

              When the majority rejects a plan in a (d)emocracy - what is supposed to happen?

            "I have often seen people uncivil by too much civility, and tiresome in their courtesy." Michel de Montaigne

            by JesseCW on Mon Feb 04, 2013 at 01:04:00 AM PST

            [ Parent ]

            •  Earlier, they rejected the Peel Plan (0+ / 0-)

              which would have given a much smaller amount of land to the Jews. Anyway, it's clear we're not going to convince each other. I believe in a two-state solution. Israel needs to give up the West Bank. If you want Israel to just go away, I don't agree. That's all.

              Please visit: http://www.jkmediasource.org

              by Noisy Democrat on Mon Feb 04, 2013 at 05:40:54 AM PST

              [ Parent ]

              •  You're operating from the starting position that (1+ / 0-)
                Recommended by:
                Fire bad tree pretty

                Palestinians were obligated to give away some substantial part of their land.

                You don't care whether or not the majority of the people in Palestine were ok with this.  

                This is profoundly anti (small d) democratic.  It's a 19th century view of the world which holds that anybody not building battleships or steam engines simply isn't entitled to self determination.

                Thank you for answering my question concerning what you believe ought to happen if current demographic trends continue and Jews become a minority inside the state of Israel.

                Evidently, you want the same thing that happened last time this was the case.  A "solution" that disregards of the concepts of self governance and equality.

                "I have often seen people uncivil by too much civility, and tiresome in their courtesy." Michel de Montaigne

                by JesseCW on Mon Feb 04, 2013 at 06:04:03 AM PST

                [ Parent ]

                •  I told you I don't know (0+ / 0-)

                  I also don't know what the ethnic Chinese who've been moving into Tibet should do if the Tibetans ever manage to get independence. I don't have solutions for all these kinds of problems.

                  I do believe that the Jewish nation, like any other nation, has a reasonable right to a homeland. So do the Palestinians.

                  What do you propose Israel should do?

                  Please visit: http://www.jkmediasource.org

                  by Noisy Democrat on Mon Feb 04, 2013 at 07:13:58 AM PST

                  [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site