Skip to main content

View Diary: Abbreviated Pundit Round-Up (149 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I thought the question at issue in that case (0+ / 0-)

    was the mid-term nature of the gerrymander, not the district boundaries.

    I haven't read it, so I could be wrong, but my recollection of the reporting at the time certainly made it look that way.

    When the union's inspiration /Through the workers' blood shall run /There can be no power greater /Anywhere beneath the sun /Solidarity Forever!

    by litho on Sun Feb 03, 2013 at 06:20:52 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  Both (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      Supremes said mid-decade is okay, and then said all the districts but one were acceptable.

      So now there's a precedent that Democrats can use IF we concentrate on state races in 2014.

      We can safely abandon the doctrine of the eighties, namely that the rich were not working because they had too little money, the poor because they had too much. JK Galbraith, 1991

      by Urban Owl on Sun Feb 03, 2013 at 07:00:56 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site