Skip to main content

View Diary: Assassination Rationales Then & Now--And How Awlaki Didn't Meet Any of the Criteria (163 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I agree entirely (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    kurious, Bisbonian

    The policy - which I think was started in the Bush administration, but greatly expanded by the Obama team - is horribly short-sighted.

    I think it is entirely likely that the GOP could raise a congressional hue and cry about the illegality of this policy and calls for impeachment, etc., as a way of scoring points against Obama, and then turn around and carry on the exact same methods and even expand them to cover "criminals" here inside the US when one of their own gets to be president.

    "The fool doth think he is wise: the wise man knows himself to be a fool" - W. Shakespeare

    by Hugh Jim Bissell on Tue Feb 05, 2013 at 08:48:46 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  What exactly would be considered an Impeachable... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      aliasalias, gerrilea

      ...offense?  Killing American citizens without due process?  Claiming a secret legal justification for such an action.  Claiming the power of the courts and ignoring the constitutionally mandated powers of the Congress to check Executive power?  We're not talking about lying about Oval office blow jobs here.

      Btw, this did NOT start in the Bush administration.  The groundwork of claiming extra-judicial powers to eavesdrop and spy on Americans without obtaining a warrant is a FAR CRY from claiming the power to kill Americans without due process.  this is PURELY a construct of the current administration, as hard as that might be for you to accept.

      •  I do see the connections. (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        It's not difficult at all to see this as the next chapter of a narrative started in 2001.

        if necessary for years; if necessary, alone

        by SouthernLiberalinMD on Tue Feb 05, 2013 at 01:33:24 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Elizabeth Holtzman... (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          gerrilea, aliasalias

          "The Impeachment of George W. Bush"

          This book focuses on four articles of impeachment: The Offense of Wiretapping Surveillance in Defiance of the Law; the Offence of Lying and Inducing America to Support a War; The Offense of Reckless Indifference to the Lives and Welfare of American Troops; The Offense of Torture in Violation of U.S. Laws and Treaties. It also provides an invaluable guide to how citizens can get involved in campaigning for impeachment, as well as an important historical analysis of impeachments past. The publication of this book is a summons to action in this process.
          Funny, there were some credible Dems who were making a valid case for impeaching the former president regarding warrant-less wiretapping.  Wonder why, if this is the 'next chapter of a narrative (translated:  escalation of a policy considered an offense worthy of impeachment), it's unthinkable to consider impeachment (not necessarily Senate conviction) based on this escalation?

          I'm not making the argument that there hasn't been an expansion of dubious policies which were instituted after 9/11.  Obviously, there has been.  Had Holtzman carried the day back in 2006, this current chapter would never have been written.  Now we're left with the sad reality that if we once thought an impeachment of Bush was possible based on illegal eavesdropping, how can we not think the same of the current president for expanding those policies to include due process-free assassinations of Americans, making Bush look like a Peeping Tom in comparison?


          •  Hey, no argument here. (2+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            4kedtongue, gerrilea

            If anybody ever got impeached for this sort of thing. Apparently having sex with interns is the only real impeachable offense.

            The "sad truth" is actually that an impeachment of Bush was not possible; both Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama threw that idea out.

            Although, in the interests of strict accuracy, you are putting words into my mouth as I said nothing about impeachment of anybody. Still, as it happens I agree with you, so no harm, no foul.

            if necessary for years; if necessary, alone

            by SouthernLiberalinMD on Tue Feb 05, 2013 at 02:11:43 PM PST

            [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site