Skip to main content

View Diary: WA Redistricting: What could have been (50 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  It is not swing (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Englishlefty

    D+4 isn't all that swingy.  And Obama won the new CD-8 in 2012.  And if the growth is indeed in the Dem areas, it will slide away from him all over again.  As will WA-01, since its King County portion is quite large.  Also, court maps will not produce a radically better map.  the only change between what they came up with here and what a court would do is make a somewhat bluer CD-8.  Other than that, not much change.

    "Each player must accept the cards life deals him or her: but once they are in hand, he or she alone must decide how to play the cards in order to win the game." -Voltaire

    by KingofSpades on Sat Feb 09, 2013 at 09:23:58 PM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  At least on 2008 numbers (0+ / 0-)

      WA-1 was D+1 or 2. And the difference between the WA-8 the commission drew and what a court would have drawn is the difference between R+ 1 or 2 and D+6ish, and with Dave Reichert as the incumbent, that's the difference between likely R and likely D.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site