Skip to main content

View Diary: Updated x2 - CNBC/CNN put Tesla to the Test. NY Times Fails. (230 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  huh? (0+ / 0-)

    "heroic efforts to stay alive", please. And you should read his take on the ombudsman's report.

    I have no idea why my honest reading of these stories makes me an evangelical against EVs. I'm not, and frankly I'm currently shopping for a hybrid (although the diesel powered Jetta is in the running). The only thing I'm evangelical about is speaking out when I see others trying to pull the wool over folks eyes. And all of these stories and positions share that in spades.

    We were not ahead of our time, we led the way to our time.

    by i understand on Wed Feb 20, 2013 at 11:18:14 AM PST

    [ Parent ]

    •  "heroic efforts to stay alive", please -what? (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      radical simplicity

      I've read every main article that's come out. I don't know what this sentence fragment is supposed to prove.

      One one had we have repeated disingenuity by the NYT writer.

      On the other we have a company owner pissed off and who  made the mistake of using the word "faked". Well that word goes to state of mind and that is something that cannot be proved. So he should have used the word disingenuous instead. That can be proven and is in ample evidence in the original NYT article,

      To state Mr Musk is spinning "at least as much" is worse than a claim of false equivalency, because false equivalency is your best-case scenario. According to you, the odds are Telsa motors is more at fault than Mr Broder.

      So as I said, I do not see your writings as coming from a genuine unbiased POV.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site