Skip to main content

View Diary: 'If I were on the Court,' Obama would vote for marriage equality nationwide (62 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Didn't the SC already dismiss a case (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    against a ban on gay marriage by a state? They wouldn't even entertain the question.

    What would be bold about repeating that?

    •  You're thinking of Baker v. Nelson (0+ / 0-)

      That was, however, 41 years ago (before Romer and Lawrence, and before several other cases that expanded precedent with regard to marriage in general) and addressed an issue which is not currently before the court).

      Writing in all lower-case letters should be a capital offense

      by ebohlman on Fri Mar 01, 2013 at 07:15:10 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Wiki tells me the two men in B v N (0+ / 0-)

        are still living happily together (well, I'm assuming the 'happy' part) 41 years later.

        You can deny legal recognition of love, but you can't deny the love.

        ad astra per alia porci

        by harrije on Fri Mar 01, 2013 at 08:08:01 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site