Skip to main content

View Diary: Detroit's EFM: four tax liens in four years (116 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  No, just a choice in how to parcel out state power (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Keith930, caul

    The state is the sovereign entity here.  The state runs some subdivisions by itself (counties) and lets others (cities) run themselves.  Either way, it's ultimately the state that makes the rules.  

    There's no taxation without representation. Everyone's allowed to vote for the state officials that make the rules for organizing the political subdivisions.  It wouldn't be unfair at all to just run the entire state as a single "tax district" and equalize, for instance, school resources state-wide, instead of the fucked-up mishmash we have now.  Why should Grosse Pointe have awesome, highly-funded schools and Detroit have overcrowded under-financed schools?  People in both places pay the taxes.

    •  or at least 46% of them do.... n/t (0+ / 0-)

      Oregon: Sure...it's cold. But it's a damp cold.

      by Keith930 on Sat Mar 16, 2013 at 03:32:16 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Can you name any aspiring state politician (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      PatriciaVa, FG

      who has advocated such a single statewide tax district and subsequent equalization, and gotten elected?

      Serious question....I don't know.  Perhaps there has been.  Schools are one thing, but when you propose using taxes from Kalamazoo to pay for cops, trash collectors and city road crew in Detroit, I suspect that is a losing platform to run on.

      Oregon: Sure...it's cold. But it's a damp cold.

      by Keith930 on Sat Mar 16, 2013 at 03:37:24 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  People with better schools (0+ / 0-)

        now have a vested interest in keeping their little piece of the pie away from the hungry folk.  But that doesn't mean it's "undemocratic" for a state to NOT devolve its power to a city, or to reserve the right to fix a city's problems if the city demonstrates an inability to do so.  That's my point.

        •  question (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          surelyujest

          do you really think the governor and state house in MI is interested in truly fixing Detroit?  It apparently hasn't worked anywhere else but in one small community in southwest MI, which apparently was able to come out of needing an emergency financial manager.

          How is taking a hundred dollars worth of food from hungry kids or from old poor sick people equal to taking a hundred dollars from billionaires? -- howabout, 19 Dec 2012

          by billlaurelMD on Sat Mar 16, 2013 at 05:32:18 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  If they're trying to destroy Detroit (0+ / 0-)

            Then Snyder made an odd pick, going with a Democrat who helped give the President one of his signature accomplishments (saving the auto industry).

            Ultimately, I don't know Snyder's motives.  Seems logical that it's a ploy to shore up reelection.  Right now, he's going to lose.  He has to do something.  If Detroit isn't fixed, it's not like Snyder's going to lose more votes from there.  He didn't get any last time to speak of.  And he can still claim that he's "doing something" about Detroit, for the dog-whistle crowd.

            And if Detroit does turn around, then he'll take the credit.  Maybe even pick up 10% of the Detroit vote and a lot of independents.  It's really win-win for him.

            I think self-preservation is more likely the explanation for the EM appointment than straight-up mustache-twirling evil.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (170)
  • Baltimore (86)
  • Community (84)
  • Bernie Sanders (66)
  • Freddie Gray (59)
  • Civil Rights (54)
  • Elections (41)
  • Culture (38)
  • Hillary Clinton (36)
  • Media (35)
  • Racism (32)
  • Law (31)
  • 2016 (31)
  • Labor (26)
  • Education (26)
  • Environment (25)
  • Republicans (23)
  • Politics (23)
  • Barack Obama (22)
  • Police (20)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site