Skip to main content

View Diary: Drunk Teen Fatally Shot For Entering His Neighbor's Home Thinking It Was His Home (141 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  ROFL, Supreme Court Decisions are RW talking (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    PavePusher

    points? History is a RW talking point?

    I see that you are a student of Mr. Bernay's, thanks for letting us know!

    -7.62; -5.95 The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.~Tesla

    by gerrilea on Tue Mar 19, 2013 at 08:40:09 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  ROFLMAO, SCOTUS now hates Europe? (0+ / 0-)

      Scalia, maybe, is afraid he'd get his comeuppance there. The others seem to enjoy it.

      I'm sorry for the scare your brother had, and glad no-one was hurt. Was there a racial element to the break-in, e.g. is your brother black and the burglars were white? Just curious.

      Your thought-process on guns seems straight out of a libertarian die. That can be entertaining as a sophomore or in basic training, but quickly grows tiresome.

      As for the "European mind-set".  They've been conditioned into victimization. The greatest tool the oppressor has is the mind of the oppressed. ... The massive restrictions upon firearm ownership and their demonization for almost 100 yrs there has conditioned their society into seeing them as evil incarnate. That gun control movement in Europe started right after the Bolshevik Revolution. The powers that be feared the masses.
      Funny, I don't recall reading this Supreme Court ruling, which case was it? (I'm assuming you're not so stupid as to buy into the right-wing conspiratorial paranoia, e.g. that gun-control and the National Firearms Act of 1934 is part of some nefarious plot by 'powers-that-be' to usurp democracy.)

      Bernays did many evil things, notably tobacco promotion, but gun-control was not one of them. Quoting Bernays does not make you clever.

      Most of us on DailyKos agree that "the danger attending the indiscriminate possession of revolvers or pistols is obvious."

      •  Selective reading comprehension & propaganda. (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        PavePusher

        Your issues, not mine.

        The SC made clear the police have no duty to protect any of us.  How you've warped it into a personal ad hominem is classic Bernay's:  "you're not so stupid as to buy into the right-wing conspiratorial paranoia"

        Argumentum ad populum:

        "Most of us on DailyKos agree that..."

        Meaningless false arguments that do not address the issues presented.  Feeble attempts to distract from the facts that you do not have.

        Clearly you don't like history or those of us that have actually studied it as a profession. The socioeconomic issues brought about by big oil (Standard Oil) along with the Banksters (or criminal banking cartels) to consolidate their power and influence isn't a secret or CT, it's historical fact.  Big tobacco wasn't the only one reading Bernay's writings.

        Eric Holder in 1995:

        The dying rule of law, the erosion of our constitution

        "There is only so much you can extract out of the country, out of the people. What is left to take after all that?

        You take away the people's rights, because you have to insure the continuance of the power structure in place".
        Recall what Eric Holder said in 1995 regarding guns and then fast forward to today:

        The Day 'Due Process' Died: Obama, Holder and the End of Rights

        In his speech, Attorney General Holder said things no honest man would ever believe would be said by the highest law officer in the United States.

        Holder said "that a careful and thorough executive branch review of the facts in a case amounts to 'due process' and that the Constitution's Fifth Amendment protection against depriving a citizen of his or her life without due process of law does not mandate a 'judicial process.'"

        This isn't a game of "left versus right".  The immaturity of your personal attacks and limited abilities to think critically cannot distract those of us that have been paying attention.

        I could give a systematic review of how social media shapes and controls the American people and their attitudes but I'll leave that for another day.

        -7.62; -5.95 The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.~Tesla

        by gerrilea on Wed Mar 20, 2013 at 04:53:02 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site