Skip to main content

View Diary: Marriage equality in front of Supreme Court for second day (63 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  just to be fair, (0+ / 0-)

    it was Scalia who went unhinged in the Lawrence v. Texas dissent, fretful about how the state can't morally condemn gays or ban masturbation.  Thomas's dissent was short, he called the ban on sodomy "uncommonly silly," but thought the state was within its power.  It's discriminatory, but not vitriolic.  Thomas is ideologically more extreme than Scalia, and there are questions about him as a person, but he isn't dispeptic.

    Difficult, difficult, lemon difficult.

    by Loge on Wed Mar 27, 2013 at 08:30:00 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Heh. (0+ / 0-)
      [H]e isn't dispeptic.
      Well, it's an infamous matter of record that Thomas favors Coca-Cola (making him, in some sense, dysPeptic), no?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site