Skip to main content

View Diary: Exxon's Skies: Why Is Exxon Controlling the No-Fly Zone Over Arkansas Tar Sands Spill? (219 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Ok, nevermind (10+ / 0-)

    You clearly are not interested in discussion because you've made up your mind and now you're just making stuff up. Nowhere have I said anything regarding public oversight. Good day, you're obviously off your rocker on this subject.

    [Terrorists] are a dime a dozen, they are all over the world and for every one we lock up there will be three to take his place. --Digby

    by rabel on Wed Apr 03, 2013 at 07:33:37 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  You're clearly dedicated to berating those you (5+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      corvo, shaharazade, mrkvica, elwior, radmul

      cannot baffle with bullshit.

      So far, everyone who disagree with the blindly pro-corporate shit you're spewing is "unhinged" or "off their rocker".

      But, really, you're so very reasonable.

      income gains to the top 1% from 2009 to 2011 were 121% of all income increases. How did that happen? Incomes to the bottom 99% fell by 0.4%

      by JesseCW on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 05:46:48 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Re (6+ / 0-)
        So far, everyone who disagree with the blindly pro-corporate shit you're spewing is "unhinged" or "off their rocker".
        But, really, you're so very reasonable.
        You are, and he is.

        Several posters here have demonstrated how NOTAMs are issued and how common they are. Once you were educated about this, you could have said "oh, that's all right then", which is what reasonable people do.

        Instead, on no evidence at all you continue on this cringeworthy quest to make something out of nothing. We have enough serious governance problems here without manufacturing more, and destroying our own credibility in the process!

        (-5.50,-6.67): Left Libertarian
        Leadership doesn't mean taking a straw poll and then just throwing up your hands. -Jyrinx

        by Sparhawk on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 05:58:30 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  "reasonable people" all adhere to your extremist (4+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          corvo, shaharazade, elwior, radmul

          Randian view of the proper relationship between corporations and government?

          Again, like the previous poster, you offer no arguments - just claims that your far right positions on the freedoms that ought to be granted corporate entities are "reasonable".

          income gains to the top 1% from 2009 to 2011 were 121% of all income increases. How did that happen? Incomes to the bottom 99% fell by 0.4%

          by JesseCW on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 06:33:18 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  My view is irrelevant here (2+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            Mad Season, Larsstephens

            The point is that multiple subject matter experts in this thread have noted that this is no big deal, happens all the time, etc.

            But everything must be a corporate conspiracy to you and posters like you.

            (-5.50,-6.67): Left Libertarian
            Leadership doesn't mean taking a straw poll and then just throwing up your hands. -Jyrinx

            by Sparhawk on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 07:07:32 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

      •  In the good old days (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        elwior

        accusations that other site users were insane would be HRed into oblivion.  But defenders of Exxon get a special pass now, it seems.

        The continuing rightward slide of the "Democratic Party" on display.

        Dogs from the street can have all the desirable qualities that one could want from pet dogs. Most adopted stray dogs are usually humble and exceptionally faithful to their owners as if they are grateful for this kindness. -- H.M. Bhumibol Adulyadej

        by corvo on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 07:43:21 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site