Skip to main content

View Diary: Exxon's Skies: Why Is Exxon Controlling the No-Fly Zone Over Arkansas Tar Sands Spill? (219 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I quoted the FAA person from the article (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    elwior, madhaus

    so you are fed up with them, not me:

    "This also means press is prohibited from the area, though Lunsford told Dow Jones that the FAA "is in the process of amending the restriction to allow news media aircraft into the area.""

    That is what I copied from the article, and you are the one mistakenly taking their quote out of context to mean all the area, and not the no fly zone area, which is how the FAA person described it as well.

    Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell. --Edward Abbey

    by greenbastard on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 08:33:43 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Really? (4+ / 0-)

      You're going to run with this ignorance?

      So now the FAA can restrict media from the ground as well? You do realize that FAA is the Federal Aviation Administration, right? They don't have any ability to limit people on the ground. You also refuse to acknowledge that this is a limitation on aircraft 1000'AGL and below.

      You apparently are too dense to recognize this isn't a no-fly zone, it's simply restricted access 1000' and below. I'm done with you and your conspiracies, fantasies and frankly outright delusional thinking and voluntary ignorance. You refuse to understand and that makes you just as dangerous and irresponsible as any oil executive trying to squeeze out another dollar by raping the land and lying to the people.  Good day.

      [Terrorists] are a dime a dozen, they are all over the world and for every one we lock up there will be three to take his place. --Digby

      by rabel on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 08:41:59 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  you say you won't continue to argue (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        but then you keep doing it, and you keep arguing with yourself because I never said anything about it being on the ground, nor did the FAA person from the article I quoted.

        When the FAA person stated, ""This also means press is prohibited from the area," I didn't say they meant the ground, nor is that their implication. It is yours alone.

        Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell. --Edward Abbey

        by greenbastard on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 09:01:55 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Please get a clue. When the FAA referred (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          Larsstephens, Otteray Scribe

          to "this area", they're talking the area IN THE AIR LESS THAN 1000 FEET.

          This kind of absolutely silly - no, make that stupid - chicken little type crap is the weakest part of the progressive movement.  Too many people are similar to the redstaters, and won't let go of their conspiracy or plutocracy theories even when the facts slap them in the face.  How ridiculous a  few of you are being.  And solely because you couldn't accept sensible explanations in the beginning, but just kept digging your hole deeper and deeper and now when faced with how silly you've been, can not face admitting it.  

          "If you trust you are not critical; if you are critical you do not trust" by our own Dauphin

          by gustynpip on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 11:12:42 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  rAmen!!! (0+ / 0-)

            "Double, double, toile and trouble; Fire burne, and Cauldron bubble... By the pricking of my Thumbes, Something wicked this way comes": Republicans!!. . Willkommen im Vierten Reich! Sie haben keine Bedeutung mehr.

            by Bluefin on Thu Apr 04, 2013 at 01:48:34 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site