Skip to main content

View Diary: The Farm II: Changing People (16 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  No. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    marina, RiveroftheWest, dadoodaman

    At least I don't think so.

    It's the tell-tale sign of a non-heirarchical group, one that is trying to communication with intentionality.

    btw, this is not to say that Gaskin's movement was democratic. It wasn't. It was an autocracy. He was the spiritual leader. They would discuss things but he, as the "authority" on what they were doing, made the decisions. As you would expect, this had varying results, especially as time went on and the followers matured individually and as a community.

    What's the point of letting neoliberals into the tent when neoliberalism is burning down the campground?
    Since elections will never change the ownership of government, why does our strategy rely entirely upon them?

    by Words In Action on Mon Apr 08, 2013 at 12:47:40 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site