Skip to main content

View Diary: Did Gerrymandering Cost Dems the House? A 34-State Look at Alternative Nonpartisan Maps Suggests Yes (161 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Thanks. Yes this is unfortunately an area where (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    philipmerrill

    Republicans have a huge advantage too thanks to the 2010 bloodbath. That was really the electoral equivalent of winning the lottery for them since it was a redistricting year. States like Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina, among others all have GOP legislatures because they're heavily gerrymandered, while states like Ohio that are swingy make it still impossible for us to win the majority.

    Then you have states like Georgia where the GOP can gerrymander us into superminority status so that even if we elect a governor they can override our vetoes.

    Colorado came within 200 votes of having a Dem trifecta in 2010 which would have locked the state up for us. We could have gerrymandered a comfortable majority in the legislature and 2 more congressional seats and that would have led to a wave of progressive legislation even more so than the great things we've already seen from the state.

    On the other hand, Minnesota's governor race came within 7,000 votes or so of them winning the trifecta and that would have been an utter disaster for the state. Instead we now have a Dem trifecta but unlike Colorado they've been fumbling issues like the budget.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site