Skip to main content

View Diary: Daily Kos Elections Live Digest: 4/16 (342 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Just because that disclaimer is there (0+ / 0-)

    doesn't mean anything. I could say no disrespect, but your an idiot. Not you of course, just an example.

    •  While that is true (4+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      HoosierD42, IllinoyedR, jncca, ArkDem14

      You answered a six paragraph post with three letters, and then ignored the reasons stated in the post in your second reply to ask a question that was answered in the post.

      Your opinion obviously differs, but "ugh" is not helpful, and then not engaging the words written isn't helpful either.

      This is hardly ugh-worthy, even if you might be among those who disagree:

      It's best to evaluate candidates base on strengths and weaknesses, and who you feel has a better chance in the general. Not just blindly support a candidate just because she's a woman.

      Mr. Gorbachev, establish an Electoral College!

      by tommypaine on Tue Apr 16, 2013 at 02:18:46 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  *you're (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      HoosierD42, Audrid

      Home: North Shore of Illinois, College: Main Line of Pennsylvania (PA-07)

      by IllinoyedR on Tue Apr 16, 2013 at 03:12:40 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Well, they supported (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      betelgeux, ArkDem14

      the less liberal Elizabeth Esty over Chris Donovan.  In retrospect, considering his scandal, that was smart, but that wasn't their rationale.

      Nikki Tinker is definitely the most egregious.

      Sheila Smoot was better than Terri Sewell, and that was a Safe D seat so electability didn't have to play into it.

      But more importantly, the idea that a woman is more deserving of an office than a man just because she is a man is no better than the idea that a White person is more deserving than a Black person, or a man more deserving than a woman, or a straight person more deserving than a queer one.

      20, CA-18 (home), CA-13 (school)
      politicohen.com
      Socially libertarian, moderate on foreign policy, immigration, and crime, liberal on everything else.
      UC Berkeley; I think I'm in the conservative half of this city. -.4.12, -4.92

      by jncca on Tue Apr 16, 2013 at 03:30:36 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Those are very different (4+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        James Allen, ndrwmls10, askew, bumiputera

        because certain groups (women, LGBT people, black people) are underrepresented in positions of power, and in a more general sense, historically screwed over by society at large. I think getting more of them into office is a valid aim. Now, I'm not going to be donating to EMILY's List anytime soon, due to the fact that they sometimes pick the less progressive candidate just because she's female (and also the fact that I don't have much to throw around). But I do generally look on them favorably as an organization.

        Yes, it is bread we fight for -- but we fight for roses, too! | Pro-transit young black urban progressive | SSP/DKE | -9, -7.79 | MO-05: come for the jazz, stay for the burnt ends | Yard signs don't vote.

        by gabjoh on Tue Apr 16, 2013 at 07:38:20 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site