Skip to main content

View Diary: Thank You for Smoking?: The President's Pre-K Plan (114 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  We know what works. And it's not actually gums (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    devis1, kainah, AoT, Lonely Liberal in PA

    and patches and pills.

    We can take the advertising out of the windows.  We can get the smokes away from eye level.  We can, state by state, make it just as hard to get a license to sell smokes as to sell hard liquor.

    We can stop tobacco companies cracking nicotine into a freebase form.

    I'm not kidding about that.

    http://biopsychiatry.com/...

    There's a lot we could do, if regressive taxes targeting a reviled minority of people suffering from addiction weren't seen as a popular "something for nothing".

    dEar Ellois: U send Fud down holez, we no eaTz u. That iz deAl. No forget. MooRlockz Haz 2 eats. Stoopid Elloiz.

    by JesseCW on Sun Apr 14, 2013 at 08:17:52 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Too Easy (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Wood Dragon

      The tobacco companies manipulate the tobacco product to increase addiction rates--with MAOIs, changing pH (AKA free-basing), and so on.

      The pharma companies then get to charge you for a product to quit that has a low success rate and costs a fortune.

      Then the FDA goes after a harm-reduction alternative that works (the electronic) and that people have used to quit.  Fortunately, the not-quite-corrupt-yet court system knocked that down a number of years ago.  They're trying again this year.

      It only makes sense if you assume that, as a whole, government doesn't concern itself with the welfare of the people, merely the constant flow of money to itself and its benefactors.

      (-6.38, -7.03) Moderate left, moderate libertarian

      by Lonely Liberal in PA on Mon Apr 15, 2013 at 04:56:38 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  If This Tax Is Any Indication...... (2+ / 0-)

        ......the latter option is the government's only concern.  If they didn't want people to smoke, they wouldn't expand health care and preschool programs exclusively with dollars raised by cigarette taxes.  Not sure it's humanly possible to be TOO cynical about government's motives when tobacco is involved.

        •  The only logical conclusion... (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          Mark27

          ... is that either:

          1) They want people to smoke for the revenue it generates
          or
          2) They don't really give a f*** about funding pre-K

          The meek shall inherit the Earth that the stupid destroyed.

          by CharlieHipHop on Mon Apr 15, 2013 at 06:40:49 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (156)
  • Community (83)
  • Baltimore (79)
  • Freddie Gray (58)
  • Bernie Sanders (56)
  • Civil Rights (48)
  • Elections (39)
  • Culture (35)
  • Media (33)
  • Hillary Clinton (32)
  • 2016 (29)
  • Law (28)
  • Racism (28)
  • Education (24)
  • Environment (24)
  • Labor (23)
  • Politics (22)
  • Republicans (22)
  • Barack Obama (19)
  • Police Brutality (19)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site