Skip to main content

View Diary: Just how bad was the safety equipment at Texas fertilizer plant? (136 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Clean Air Act Section 113(c) (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    sethtriggs, DSPS owl, Penny GC

    governs.  Negligence is criminal in this instance.  Recklesness is a felony.  

    Here's the deal.  If you kill someone from what happens with a hazardous substance, you're up the creek.  Even if you were just negligent.  You don't have to acted with intent to harm, just having the harm enough meets the criminal definition.  

    This is a mom and pop.  They're gone forever.  The owners, if they are still alive, have a big problem.  Any insurer they have will be paying BIG claims.  

    •  That's my point (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Bulldozer, Penny GC

      If a big explosion happens, you can be pretty sure it's criminal somehow! And with dozens of people killed, even more so.

      Freak accidents can happen in even well run facilities, but they are very low probability enough to be almost discountable. If your giant fertilizer plant explodes, it's criminal out of the gate.

      (-5.50,-6.67): Left Libertarian
      Leadership doesn't mean taking a straw poll and then just throwing up your hands. -Jyrinx

      by Sparhawk on Thu Apr 18, 2013 at 06:19:46 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site