Skip to main content

View Diary: The high cost of low prices: 87 dead (30 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Starving, mostly (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    aaraujo

    Subsistence farming, which becomes increasingly untenable in one of the world's most densely populated countries.

    It's not like Bangladesh was some sort of paradise before the sweatshops came. The sweatshops actually gave people who were unemployed a job. The big problem is that the customers of the sweatshops - big multinational retailers - are not insuring that their sub-contractors are observing even the most basic health and safety concerns of the workers.

    Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre, mod sceal þe mare, þe ure mægen lytlað

    by milkbone on Wed Apr 24, 2013 at 01:31:49 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  not all starving (0+ / 0-)

      managed subsistence farming can support large populations

    •  That's simply false. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      aaraujo

      The destitute citizens of third world nations like Bangladesh are the very intentional victims of Western 'Neo-Liberal' economic colonialism- policies carefully crafted to destroy the viability and sustainability of native agriculture for the benefit of factory farming in wealthy nations like the U.S. and France.

      The horrific sweatshop conditions in Bangladeshi factories are likewise not the unintentional and unfortunate result of benign neglect or lack of oversight by Mal-Wart™. Instead, they are the intended outcome of an economic order that demands nations like Bangladesh drop any tariffs or other restrictions that might protect native industry, cracking open these vulnerable threadbare economies to the tender mercies of predatory corporations. Corporations that buy and sell local politicians.

      It's not the result of some natural law. It's predatory corporate capitalism, pure and simple.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site