Skip to main content

View Diary: Let's Teach the Controversy of Evolution vs Intelligent Design **Updated with Poll question** (365 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Oh, and I like to call it Inelegant Design (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Joieau, armd

    Some other examples of Inelegant Design to go along with back pain:

    Human sinuses: Sinuses work great if you have a snout, even one as small as a chimpanzee's. Once they get compacted into a human-shaped face, they are crap. Definitely inelegant.

    Testicles: I mean, seriously? OUTSIDE? Who's idea was that? It's not even like it's necessary. Several species have internal testicles. We just happen to have evolved from one of the ones that were home sick the day that was discussed in class.

    Teeth: Again, several species evolved regenerating teeth. Why not us? We're supposed to be the "designer's" bestest friends. Why didn't we get better teeth?

    Not to mention regeneration of everything else: why do lizards get it and we didn't?

    Fat: If we're so intelligently designed, why do we get fat? Why doesn't the system optimize for lower metabolic needs? We excrete excess vitamins, why don't we excrete excess fat?

    Cancer: I mean, come ON! They didn't even get that one right. We should at least have an immune system that handles cancer impeccably.

    The list can go on and on. If the same designer created all of the universe and the human body, he MUST have been up all night partying the night before.

    •  Not sure about the rest but on Lizards... (0+ / 0-)

      I think the quick answer is that Scar tissue forms faster.

      I remember reading somewhere that basically the lizard method of regeneration only really works well if you can stay still for a while and don't need to worry so much about food or being eaten yourself.

      Scar tissue forms faster and is "Good enough" for mammals with fast metabolisms that need food often and probably had to originally worry about some types of predators early on.

      •  But god (0+ / 0-)

        can just say abracadabra, right? None of this needs to be based on actual science when god can just do whatever he wants, just like Ironman, or Sarah Palin or some other super hero.

        The question remains, why were humans so poorly "designed?"

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site