Skip to main content

View Diary: The Law of Unintended Consequences: Threaten the 2nd Amendment, Alienate the Military - Part II (187 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Peppered in for comic effect? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    terrybuck
    If it does happen, you don't know what the tipping point may be, ..., it could be a group wants Charmin in the latrine...
    Since when has it become fashionable to wholesale insult members of the armed forces.

    "They did not succeed in taking away our voice" - Angelique Kidjo - Opening the Lightning In a Bottle concert at Radio City Music Hall in New York City - 2003

    by LilithGardener on Tue May 07, 2013 at 03:12:41 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  The point was...no one knows (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      FrankRose, PavePusher

      what will set a group off, no matter whether it's legitimate or insane....to take the comment as an insult is a stretch beyond reality...

    •  LilithGardener: same time it became fashionable (4+ / 0-)

      to put down soldiers as mercs, nothing more, nothing less. Happens every day here on Daily Kos.

      same time it became fashionable to pick out the parts of the Constitution you like and call them important, while the ones you don't like are archaic bullshit. Happens every day here on Daily Kos.

      LBJ, Lady Bird, Van Cliburn, Ike, Ann Richards, Barbara Jordan, Molly Ivins, Sully Sullenburger, Drew Brees: Texas is NO Bush League!

      by BlackSheep1 on Tue May 07, 2013 at 06:37:28 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Some parts of the constitution (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        dream weaver, terrybuck, coquiero

        Are archaic bullshit.

      •  BlackSheep1 (3+ / 0-)

        Article V of the Constitution provides the means for changing it. The forefathers of the nation understood that things change with time and that some of the laws they wrote would become archaic with time. We might agree or disagree on what is archaic or not but that's O.K. As a matter of fact the Constitution has been amended 27 timesand the Constitution had to be amended before it was ratified. Some, enough, thought it was inadequate even before we got started. It happens here and in many other places, but discussing the Constitution is actually a very healthy exercise rather than "bullshit". It is a sign of a vibrant democracy.

        "The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie -- deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -John F. Kennedy

        by basquebob on Wed May 08, 2013 at 12:20:48 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Yeah, basquebob, that's my point: amend it (2+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          FrankRose, PavePusher

          if you have the gumption and the backing.
          Then when that amendment fails spectacularly, undo it. See Prohibition for an example.
          Don't throw out an administrative go-around and then spend 40 or 50 years locking people up over it. Make the law consistent with the Constitution, or figure out the Constitution trumps your interpretation of it. See Roe V. Wade and The War on Drugs as examples.

          LBJ, Lady Bird, Van Cliburn, Ike, Ann Richards, Barbara Jordan, Molly Ivins, Sully Sullenburger, Drew Brees: Texas is NO Bush League!

          by BlackSheep1 on Wed May 08, 2013 at 07:57:34 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  So having this conversation (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:
            coquiero

            is not "bullshit", right?

            You have to start somewhere.

            "The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie -- deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -John F. Kennedy

            by basquebob on Wed May 08, 2013 at 10:21:22 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  go look what I've been saying (1+ / 0-)
              Recommended by:
              PavePusher

              since about the day after Newtown, IIRC.

              You want to ban guns? Amend the Constitution so you can.
              Otherwise ... Hi, Prometheus, how's tricks today?

              LBJ, Lady Bird, Van Cliburn, Ike, Ann Richards, Barbara Jordan, Molly Ivins, Sully Sullenburger, Drew Brees: Texas is NO Bush League!

              by BlackSheep1 on Wed May 08, 2013 at 10:22:55 AM PDT

              [ Parent ]

              •  BlackSheep1 (1+ / 0-)
                Recommended by:
                coquiero

                I was just responding to the comment above, nothing more, nothing less.

                As for amending the constitution in this case, particularly as it pertains to the second amendment, reasonable arguments can be made and have been made as far as the necessity to amend the Constitution or not in order to have reasonable gun laws. This issue has already been brought to the highest courts and the courts have ruled that reasonable limits can be imposed, no need for a Constitutional amendment. That is simply a fact.

                This argument is not about the Constitution, some just want to deflect and distract. This argument is about reasonable gun laws.

                "The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie -- deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -John F. Kennedy

                by basquebob on Wed May 08, 2013 at 11:27:39 AM PDT

                [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site