Skip to main content

View Diary: Good news/bad news on Keystone XL: Biden is opposed, but says he is in the minority (75 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  In the Democratic Primary? (0+ / 0-)

    It's a free shot to get an issue on Hillary. I don't care that he's taking the right position of politics, but it certainly makes case from a political standpoint. Between this and marriage equality and coming up for release of the torture report, he's amassing some base-friendly left-of-Hillary positions, which he'll need to have a shot in hell.

    •  I haven't heard Hillary take a position on this (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      issue, and it isn't always the case that the progressive position wins in the Democratic primaries (and a progressive candidate hasn't won the democratic pres primary in 40 years).

    •  I think Biden's opposition to keystone xl (0+ / 0-)

      is more likely based on his evaluation of the merits rather than playing political games.  But in the end, what's it matter what his motive is?  If a politician chooses to do the right thing because it's politically expedient, well, that's the way things are supposed to work.

      If a politician does the right thing by doing something that is costly politically, then it's an exercise in political courage and something to be commended, but in a certain sense it's not ideally how things are supposed to work.

      Theoretically, a politician would do whatever is politically expedient on any given issue (within Constitutional bounds), and in so doing they'd be doing the "right" thing by definition, in that they'd be representing the will of the public, and so would retain office.  I wouldn't like voting for someone that merely always did the politically easy thing (for example, I'm glad our pols did TARP and the auto bailout, both of which were the politically hard thing to do), but in theory it's a valid way to for a politician to decide what to do.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site