Skip to main content

View Diary: Reports On the DoJ’s Seizure of AP Journalists’ Phone Records and the Shield Law (Part I of III) (38 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  May be so but (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    what has that got to do with the merits of the case? Is this about legitimate concerns over the actions of the DoJ? Or is it just an opportunity to bash folks for presumed hypocrisy?

    If the latter, I'll take a pass.

    Nothing human is alien to me.

    by WB Reeves on Sat May 18, 2013 at 09:04:59 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  There is no "presumed" hypocrisy. (0+ / 0-)

      Hypocrisy is a fact in this matter.  And I'm pretty damn sick of it.

      Show me where I'm wrong that no Democrat would have called this a scandal had Bush encountered the exact same events.  Tell me that there would be no front page stories or diaries reciting how Bush was wrong, how this was, indeed, a scandal, actually three of them.

      That's my point.  Follow the thread, I suggest.  

      •  A speculative opinion isn't a fact. (0+ / 0-)

        It doesn't matter what the odds favoring the speculation are.

        You're arguing about hypothetical hypocrisy over a hypothetical scandal in a hypothetical alternate scenario. You're choosing to do this rather than discussing the issues material to the actual situation.

        That remains a fact, regardless of how much you may insist otherwise, in this thread or any other.

        Nothing human is alien to me.

        by WB Reeves on Sun May 19, 2013 at 01:53:43 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site