Skip to main content

View Diary: British Neo-Nazis are on the March (and Fox News is eager to help) (157 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Working Class non-muslims are being lied to. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    swampyankee

    Technically and traditionally, the British government is an Anglican theocracy ruled by the queen.

    Through agreements with parliament, they have set up a quasi-constitutional monarchy without a written constitution.

    Somehow, the British people manage, though if you look at it on paper, it shouldn't really be possible. It's really fascinating.

    But they have an official religion, an established religion, in the UK. Anglicanism. And the power of the crown is, legally, imbued with the power of the Christian god.

    It is not constitutionally or legally possible for that anglican tradition to be supplanted without the total destruction of the British government, and a small minority of religious extremists will never, EVER, achieve that goal.

    The working class people, and you, are being lied to by white nationalists like the EDL, who, once again, are fire-bombing mosques.

    An Fhirinn an aghaidh an t'Saoghail. (The truth against the world.) Is treasa tuath na tighearna. (The common people are mightier than the lords.)

    by OllieGarkey on Thu Jun 13, 2013 at 08:36:47 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Actually, I've gotten very little information (0+ / 0-)

      from the EDL. If it seems to you that I don't know anything about them, that could be why. I have spent a lot of time listening to Pat Condell, who seems like a reasonable person, and I've followed accounts in British newspapers of things like the Muslim gangs that have targeted white girls for sex slavery, and seen video of Anjam Choudary and his crowd calling for the killing of anyone who insults Islam, and of "Muslim patrols" harassing people; things like that. They look like a very nasty crowd, and I don't understand how people can carry signs in the streets calling for beheadings and not be charged with incitement to violence, but then I may not understand British law.

      Anyway, just to make sure I understand what you're saying -- you think that actually, any fears non-Muslims have about the activities of Muslim extremists are just fears that were planted by the EDL, and if the EDL didn't exist, non-Muslims would have very little concern about anything Muslims are doing?

      Please visit: http://www.jkmediasource.org

      by Noisy Democrat on Thu Jun 13, 2013 at 09:07:53 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  They would have concerns, but those concerns would (4+ / 0-)

        be based in reality, rather than based on racist lies.

        There are real fears and real problems, and white nationalists like the EDL poison the discussion, by injecting lies into it.

        The Sharia Courts are an internal problem that can be easily handled with targeted legislation. (For example, when it comes to adjudicating divorce, they cannot make decisions contrary to British Law.) One of the problems with that, as pointed out by BBC's Panorama, is that many Muslim women are not getting legally married, they're getting married solely in sharia courts.

        The Scottish government has set up resources to make sure that doesn't become a problem in Scotland. When they were dealing with forced marriages, they created immediate targeted legislation to solve the problem, and they did it by engaging with the Asian community.

        Also, Pat Condell is someone who's dangerously misinformed. Remember the so-called "Ground Zero Mosque?"

        There was a Mosque inside the World Trade Center, and it was destroyed by the 9/11 attack. Muslims died in that attack. American Muslims are not generally the radicals that have cropped up in the UK.

        No, there are some very valid concerns about radicalization, but firebombing mosques, beating muslims, and threatening moderate Muslims who are building mosques is not the way to discourage radicalism.

        You're never going to hear me say that islamism is a-okay, and I oppose it just like I oppose dominionist theocratic christianity.

        The solution to the current problems, as Humza Yousaf pointed out in that article I linked, is to give moderate Muslims the tools to deal with the bigots and assholes in their own community.

        Community policing, engaging with the Muslim community, and a few specifically targeted laws can bring this situation under control.

        And so far, this tactic hasn't been used, but I recently heard that Cameron was meeting with moderate and liberal Islamic groups. I think they're going to move in that direction now, after Woolrich.

        When it is used, Islamism in the UK with wither and die.

        To be completely honest, I wish they could just ban the Islam4UK group, The EDL, the BNP, the fascists and Islamists all together, but if they ban all of those groups together, they set a dangerous precedent, and they risk making everything much, much worse because of the blowback. They understand, as I understand, that taking away the free speech of these organizations won't make them go away, it will just make them more radical and more violent.

        Pat Condell isn't always wrong, but he's usually wrong about Islam. He doesn't know what he's talking about.

        The best group of people to talk to about the problems with Islam if you want a completely unfiltered and completely honest perspective is moderate and liberal Muslims, and former Muslim atheists.

        Seek out those organizations, and if you like Condell, I think you'll like to hear from former Muslims. I think they would be right up your alley. And there are organizations made up of those folks in the UK.

        An Fhirinn an aghaidh an t'Saoghail. (The truth against the world.) Is treasa tuath na tighearna. (The common people are mightier than the lords.)

        by OllieGarkey on Thu Jun 13, 2013 at 09:24:01 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Here's an interesting article by a UK Muslim (0+ / 0-)

          He characterizes the EDL as odious but points out that Unite Against Fascism can be just as bad and even host radical Muslims ranting against the kuffar (infidels), yet they don't get the same opprobrium from the left. He argues that if more liberals knew about this kind of Islamic radicalism, moderate Muslims would have a better chance of being heard.

          http://www.thecommentator.com/...

          Please visit: http://www.jkmediasource.org

          by Noisy Democrat on Fri Jun 14, 2013 at 10:14:58 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

      •  On this: (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Noisy Democrat
        Anyway, just to make sure I understand what you're saying -- you think that actually, any fears non-Muslims have about the activities of Muslim extremists are just fears that were planted by the EDL, and if the EDL didn't exist, non-Muslims would have very little concern about anything Muslims are doing?
        "Planted by" is incorrect. The fears--irrational, ignorant, emotional--often exist independent of the EDL. Those fears are "exploited by" the EDL, as they are by hatemongers in the US, to advance their agenda of rationalizing bigotry.

        Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time. (Terry Pratchett)

        by angry marmot on Thu Jun 13, 2013 at 09:56:18 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  Pat Condell? Really? (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Ahianne

        A man who, like many on the right, mischaracterized Park51?

        A man who has said that Islam would be outlawed in civilized society if it wasn't a religion?

        A man who has called Islam a religion of violence, which ignores the fact that just as much, if not more, violence has been committed in the name of Christianity?

        What about his views on Islam seems reasonable to you?

        •  Do you believe that Christianity (0+ / 0-)

          in the modern world is as violent and as much of a threat to the world as Islam currently is? Religions go through different stages of development; I don't see how any reasonable person could possibly say that Christianity, right now or in the immediately foreseeable future, is anywhere near as violent as Islam currently is. So yes, on that point I think he's reasonable and solidly backed up by mountains of evidence.

          Please visit: http://www.jkmediasource.org

          by Noisy Democrat on Fri Jun 14, 2013 at 10:12:23 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site