Skip to main content

View Diary: Paved with good intentions: The folly of 'open' electoral primaries (151 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Arrow's theorem (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    patbahn

    No voting system involving more than two candidates can be perfectly "fair."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/...

    We don't want our country back, we want our country FORWARD. --Eclectablog

    by Samer on Sun Jul 28, 2013 at 10:33:32 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Range voting is the answer (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      codairem

      I already put the link to the range voting organization further up, so this time I'll link to the book about it:

      http://www.amazon.com/...

      It's a fair, easy to implement system.  We should do it.  

      •  There's ALWAYS a problem (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        codairem

        Range voting allows for "tactical voting" where voters don't express their true preferences.

        Not saying it's not superior, merely that it's not a cure-all.

        We don't want our country back, we want our country FORWARD. --Eclectablog

        by Samer on Sun Jul 28, 2013 at 12:50:10 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  In theory, yes, but tactical voting never amounts (0+ / 0-)

          to anything in practice.  Santorum didn't win the Repub primary, and Clinton didn't win the Democratic one.

          99% of voters will vote their true preferences (to the extent they can figure them out).  It's time we implement ranked voting in all elections.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (151)
  • Community (65)
  • Elections (43)
  • Civil Rights (38)
  • Culture (32)
  • 2016 (32)
  • Baltimore (28)
  • Economy (27)
  • Bernie Sanders (27)
  • Texas (27)
  • Law (27)
  • Environment (26)
  • Hillary Clinton (24)
  • Labor (23)
  • Health Care (21)
  • Rescued (21)
  • Barack Obama (20)
  • Republicans (19)
  • International (18)
  • Freddie Gray (17)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site