Skip to main content

View Diary: Daily Kos Elections Live Digest: 9/6 (288 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I guess we can thank Bush (11+ / 0-)

    for making an entire generation of Americans cynical, anti-humanitarian interventionists.

    "Once, many, many years ago I thought I was wrong. Of course it turned out I had been right all along. But I was wrong to have thought I was wrong." -John Foster Dulles. My Political Compass Score: -4.00, -3.69, Proud member of DKE

    by ArkDem14 on Fri Sep 06, 2013 at 10:42:57 AM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  GW Bush's coalition is the big loser here... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      jj32, MichaelNY

      The evangelicals are not welcome in public campaigns by the GOP anymore (even though they still get what they want from the party as a whole).  They've been forced out of GOP messaging campaigns.  Now, the neocons are officially persona non grata with the public, too.  I suspect they'll be official relegated to the GOP closet like their evangelical friends soon enough.


      by LordMike on Fri Sep 06, 2013 at 10:57:42 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I don't necessarily agree (4+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        MichaelNY, LordMike, ArkDem14, jncca

        Perhaps the most touted Republican candidate for Senate of this entire cycle is Rep. Tom Cotton, who is an evangelical neoconservative.

        The most touted Republican candidate for Senate in 2010, now-Sen. Marco Rubio, is...drumroll evangelical neoconservative.

        Libertarianism -- or more accurately Paulism, which is basically evangelical libertarianism/anarcho-syndicalism ("small government", but socially conservative and anti-secular) -- has become a much stronger force in the Republican Party than it used to, but I often think that's more a function of having a Democratic president (isn't hating the very idea of government a convenient way to justify obstructing and opposing him at every turn?) and will quickly fade back to the fringes as soon as a Republican wins the White House.

        Pragmatic progressive. Oregonian, Cascadian, and American. Keeper of the DKE glossary.

        by SaoMagnifico on Fri Sep 06, 2013 at 03:06:01 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  And that was what a lot of people who opposed (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      Iraq back in 2002/2003 said. That if the war didnt turn out well, it would hurt a future presidenti's ability to ever use a military response again, even when it's necessary, because the American wouldnt be so trusting.

      It's obviously debatable whether we should use force here, but the trust an the war weariness is definitely there.

    •  I understand that sentiment (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      MichaelNY, SaoMagnifico, JGibson

      We invaded Iraq when I was 16 years old, before my political sentiments had really solidified.  At the time, with my basic understanding of politics and foreign policy, I bought into this idea that Saddam Hussein was "bad" and we should do something about it.  One year later, I had turned against the war.  The resulting decade-long involvements in both Iraq and Afghanistan cemented my beliefs.  I promised myself I would never again get swayed into supporting a non-defensive attack on another country.  I think a lot of other people did too.

      •  The problem with the Iraq precedent (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        MichaelNY, SaoMagnifico, ArkDem14

        is the reasons for that were entirely fictional.  If Sadaam just had used chemical weapons on the Kurds, and Bush said that civilized people can't tolerate that, we would look at the whole situation differently.

        Politically this is a much more clear issue: will the nation support/resist/shrug over taking missile action against one of the most entrenched dictatorships in the world?

        Iraq is not an historical precedent for that.

        Mr. Gorbachev, establish an Electoral College!

        by tommypaine on Fri Sep 06, 2013 at 01:40:45 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  No kidding (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      We are all living with the scars of the Iraq War. (Oh, and still not really giving a shit about people living with the actual scars, physical and psychological, of the Iraq War, judging by our depressingly shitty VA healthcare system and generally wrongheaded approach to mental health in this country.)

      Pragmatic progressive. Oregonian, Cascadian, and American. Keeper of the DKE glossary.

      by SaoMagnifico on Fri Sep 06, 2013 at 02:58:48 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Carville pinned it on Bush (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        MichaelNY, KingofSpades, kleinburger

        O'Reilly rolled his eyes. But damn truth it is. Republicans would be falling over themselves to vote for this is Bush was proposing it. At least Democrats are consistent with their concerns whoever the CIC happens to be.

        "What do you mean "conspiracy"? Does that mean it's someone's imaginings and that the actual polls hovered right around the result?" - petral

        by conspiracy on Fri Sep 06, 2013 at 03:54:32 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (153)
  • Community (82)
  • Baltimore (79)
  • Freddie Gray (58)
  • Bernie Sanders (55)
  • Civil Rights (47)
  • Elections (38)
  • Culture (35)
  • Media (33)
  • Hillary Clinton (32)
  • 2016 (29)
  • Law (28)
  • Racism (28)
  • Education (24)
  • Labor (23)
  • Environment (23)
  • Republicans (22)
  • Politics (22)
  • Police Brutality (19)
  • Barack Obama (19)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site