Skip to main content

View Diary: California starts regulating political blogging. Why? (124 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  I'm not sure this is a bad thing. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    trumpeter

    In NC we had a "Stand By Your Ad" statute (until the GOP clogged NCGA repealed it) that stated that any political ad had to name the people who paid for it.  I think that's important information.  Likewise, if I'm reading something written by a paid shill, I'd like to know it up front.  I'm not likely to change my opinion of the piece knowing that it's a really long political ad and not the op-ed it tries to pass itself off as, but I'd like to know it's a political ad going in.

    Addressing your points above,

    Has California state and local politics been overrun by covert, deceptive online activity? Are citizens bamboozled on a regular basis?
    I'd strike "California state and local" and "online" from that quote and say yes, politics has indeed been overrun by covert, deceptive activity -- on and offline.
    Why limit such regulations to bloggers?
    A very good question indeed -- it shouldn't be.  And, in fact, it probably isn't... It's simply that in other forms of media these policies already exist.

    I'll believe corporations are people when one comes home from Afghanistan in a body bag.

    by mojo11 on Fri Sep 20, 2013 at 11:29:00 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

  • Recommended (182)
  • Community (72)
  • Civil Rights (51)
  • Baltimore (44)
  • Elections (41)
  • Culture (38)
  • Bernie Sanders (38)
  • 2016 (34)
  • Economy (34)
  • Texas (32)
  • Law (31)
  • Labor (29)
  • Hillary Clinton (28)
  • Environment (27)
  • Rescued (23)
  • Education (23)
  • Republicans (22)
  • Health Care (21)
  • Politics (21)
  • Barack Obama (21)
  • Click here for the mobile view of the site