Skip to main content

View Diary: Koch, ALEC and giant utility company about to derail Arizona's private solar industry (184 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  there is a SC case up right now (0+ / 0-)

    to decide if CU applies at state races, in which case
    it's Mary Bar the door, for corporations buying statehouses.

    •  pat - which case is that? (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      Last term the Court struck down the Montana restrictions on political spending by corporations. The case was American Traditional Partnership v Bullock. Here is a press report.

      "let's talk about that"

      by VClib on Fri Nov 15, 2013 at 08:07:53 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  sorry it's an FEC case (0+ / 0-)
        WASHINGTON -- On Oct. 8, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) will argue to the Supreme Court that all campaign contribution limits should be eliminated and that candidates should be able to accept unlimited donations.

        Although McConnell is not a party in the case of McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court has granted the Senate minority leader time during oral argument to present his views: that campaign contribution limits are an unconstitutional burden on free speech and that the court should give contribution limits a higher level of scrutiny than it has in the past. McConnell will be represented by lawyer Bobby Burchfield.

        McCutcheon v. FEC challenges the aggregate limit on donations to federal candidates, political parties and political action committees, which bars an individual donor from giving more than $123,200 in total during the 2014 election cycle. McConnell wants to go much further by forcing courts to treat all campaign contribution limits as they treat campaign expenditure limits, which were found to be an unconstitutional burden on First Amendment rights in the 1976 Buckley v. Valeo decision.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site