Skip to main content

View Diary: Wimpy Darrell Issa can't stand the heat, so he gets out of the kitchen (298 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Holder won't do it. (0+ / 0-)

    Makes for quite a conundrum, eh?

    •  Think of the conundrum for the SCOTUS (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      JJ In Illinois, raspberryberet

      A strict interpretation of exclusively would force the court to say that the 1954 IRS interpretation (under Eisenhower) was a bad one. 501 (c)(3) status would have to be revoked from any who have been engaged in prohibited activity and might have to face

      An organization that loses its 501(c)(3) status due to being engaged in political activities cannot then qualify for 501(c)(4) status
      found here

      That sword would cut in every direction, including Thomas' and Scalia's official sponsors from Koch industries who use this for anonymity and tax exception.

      I think they'll be "gone fishing" when this mess comes calling.

      21st Century America: The distracted, superficial perception of a virtual reality. Gettov Milawn

      by geez53 on Wed Mar 05, 2014 at 05:31:42 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site