Skip to main content

View Diary: The "Marxism is coming back" trope (264 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  But most people do (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    JJ In Illinois, nextstep

    And the people who don't today have access wouldn't have had it in the past either.

    Given massive recent global improvements in living standards it is hard to argue that large numbers of people have been injured by capitalism or are worse off than they would have been without it.

    (-5.50,-6.67): Left Libertarian
    Leadership doesn't mean taking a straw poll and then just throwing up your hands. -Jyrinx

    by Sparhawk on Mon Apr 21, 2014 at 08:38:42 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

    •  Not really. (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      lucid, Superpole

      We could eliminate world hunger in a couple of years -- just remove the capitalist control over food.  Most of those who are hungry are so because they can't afford food.

      "Assume man to be man and his relationship to the world to be a human one: then you can exchange love only for love, trust for trust" -- Karl Marx

      by Cassiodorus on Mon Apr 21, 2014 at 09:20:12 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  really? (0+ / 0-)

      It's actually not hard to argue at all. Try drinking the water in West Virginia these days. Or are you already full from having drunk the kool-aid?

      What about the massive numbers of people who have been injured, poisoned, and killed as a result of "third world" mass production methods (both overseas and in the US)?

      And if your argument is that "poor people today would have been poor in the absence of capitalism" well, that's not much of an argument for "global improvement in living standards."

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site