Skip to main content

View Diary: Justice Stevens: Citizens United "giant step in the wrong direction”, calls for overturning (84 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Pretty assertive "no" there, but according to (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ozsea1

    the Washington Post which describes aggregate limits:

    For the 2013-2014 cycle, individuals can give a total of $123,200 to candidates, national party committees and certain political committees, including a $48,600 limit on what individuals can give to candidates. There are also other limits. For example, an individual can only give $2,600 to a specific candidate for federal office, per election per cycle.
    . . .
    So if the aggregate limits are struck down, what will it mean?
    A couple of things. For one thing, wealthy donors who can afford to make many donations will have greater influence when it comes to donating to candidates directly. Under the current aggregate limit of $48,600, an individual can max out at 18 federal candidates per cycle. Think of how much more they could give in total if they maxed out at 50 candidates -- or even more.
    They also referred to this chart from the FEC website.

    "Woe to those who make unjust laws,
    to those who issue oppressive decrees, to deprive the poor of their rights
    and withhold justice from the oppressed of my people, 
making widows their prey
    and robbing the fatherless."

    by Snarky McAngus on Mon Apr 21, 2014 at 01:29:49 PM PDT

    [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site