Skip to main content

View Diary: KSA was never going to let a Shiite regime in Iraq stand (39 comments)

Comment Preferences

  •  Vietnam vs. Iraq comparisons (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Roger Fox

    ... were always fatally flawed, though both got described as "civil wars." Vietnam was always organically, a "natural" nation, divided into north & south by external powers. Iraq more or less the opposite with various ethnicities & nationalities melded together into a single "state." Recent developments were more or less predictable from the beginning, and many did in fact predict them.

    Though I'm not so sure why you want to characterize this as about Saudi Arabia, or as you put in your title "KSA." FYI: KSA is an abbreviation that was heretofore unknown to me. I briefly tried to figure out if it was some major war contractor under a new name or some Al Qaeda leader's initials or something. KSM=Khalid Shiek Mohammed, KBR=Kellogg Brown Root, or some such.

    Mark Twain: It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.

    by Land of Enchantment on Sun Jun 15, 2014 at 06:59:55 AM PDT

    •  Kingdon of Saudi Arabia=KSA (0+ / 0-)

      The fighting isnt so much about KSA, but that KSA wasnt going to let Iranian backed proxy's have the run of Iraq without being a player in that theater.

      IMHO.

      .................expect us......................... FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.

      by Roger Fox on Sun Jun 15, 2014 at 10:53:26 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site